From: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/4] net: add basic splice KUnit tests
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:23:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110112325.3263078-5-amarkuze@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110112325.3263078-1-amarkuze@redhat.com>
Add small KUnit checks for the generic extraction and direct BVEC paths.
Exercise a multi-page folio over short appends and resumption, checking
payload, checksum, fragment count and ordinary references through release.
Check zero-length requests and rejected-page rollback with and without an
accepted prefix, comparing iterator position as well as remaining length.
Use separate valid and rejected segments, without a mapping fixture.
These are basic helper regressions, not an exhaustive ownership,
arithmetic-boundary or device test suite.
Signed-off-by: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
---
net/core/net_test.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 170 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/net_test.c b/net/core/net_test.c
index 2b5080c22663..c295560afbd4 100644
--- a/net/core/net_test.c
+++ b/net/core/net_test.c
@@ -1721,7 +1721,177 @@ static void netmem_ref_test_tcp_devmem_recv(struct kunit *test)
#endif
#endif
+/* skb_splice_from_iter() */
+
+#include <linux/bvec.h>
+#include <net/checksum.h>
+#include <net/hotdata.h>
+
+struct splice_basic {
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct folio *folio;
+};
+
+static void splice_basic_free_skb(struct splice_basic *c)
+{
+ int refs, nr;
+
+ if (!c->skb)
+ return;
+ nr = skb_shinfo(c->skb)->nr_frags;
+ refs = folio_ref_count(c->folio);
+ /* Keep the owner alive during cleanup of a missing-reference failure. */
+ if (refs <= nr)
+ folio_ref_add(c->folio, nr + 1 - refs);
+ kfree_skb(c->skb);
+ c->skb = NULL;
+}
+
+static void splice_basic_release(void *data)
+{
+ struct splice_basic *c = data;
+
+ splice_basic_free_skb(c);
+ if (c->folio)
+ folio_put(c->folio);
+}
+
+static struct splice_basic *splice_basic_new(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct splice_basic *c = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*c), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, c);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test,
+ kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, splice_basic_release, c), 0);
+ c->folio = folio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, c->folio);
+ c->skb = alloc_skb(64, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, c->skb);
+ return c;
+}
+
+static void splice_basic_iter(struct iov_iter *iter, struct bio_vec *bv,
+ struct kvec *kv, unsigned int nr, bool bvec)
+{
+ size_t len = 0;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+ kv[i].iov_base = page_address(bv[i].bv_page) + bv[i].bv_offset;
+ kv[i].iov_len = bv[i].bv_len;
+ len += bv[i].bv_len;
+ }
+ if (bvec)
+ iov_iter_bvec(iter, ITER_SOURCE, bv, nr, len);
+ else
+ iov_iter_kvec(iter, ITER_SOURCE, kv, nr, len);
+}
+
+static void splice_basic_expect_iter(struct kunit *test, struct iov_iter *iter,
+ const struct iov_iter *want)
+{
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, iov_iter_count(iter), iov_iter_count(want));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, iter->iov_offset, want->iov_offset);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, iter->nr_segs, want->nr_segs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test,
+ iov_iter_is_bvec(iter) ? (const void *)iter->bvec : iter->kvec,
+ iov_iter_is_bvec(want) ? (const void *)want->bvec : want->kvec);
+}
+
+static void skb_splice_basic_append(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ unsigned int bvec;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) &&
+ READ_ONCE(net_hotdata.sysctl_max_skb_frags) < 2)
+ kunit_skip(test, "two page-bounded fragments need two slots");
+ for (bvec = 0; bvec < 2; bvec++) {
+ struct splice_basic *c = splice_basic_new(test);
+ size_t len = PAGE_SIZE + 64, first = PAGE_SIZE - 27;
+ unsigned int nr = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) ? 2 : 1;
+ u8 *data = folio_address(c->folio) + 17;
+ u8 *copy = kunit_kmalloc(test, len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct bio_vec bv[2];
+ struct iov_iter iter;
+ struct kvec kv[2];
+ size_t i;
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, copy);
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ data[i] = (u8)(i * 13 + 7);
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[0], &c->folio->page, PAGE_SIZE - 17, 17);
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[1], folio_page(c->folio, 1), 81, 0);
+ splice_basic_iter(&iter, bv, kv, 2, bvec);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, skb_splice_from_iter(c->skb, &iter, first),
+ (ssize_t)first);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, iov_iter_count(&iter), len - first);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, skb_splice_from_iter(c->skb, &iter, len),
+ (ssize_t)(len - first));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, iov_iter_count(&iter), 0UL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, c->skb->len, (unsigned int)len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, skb_shinfo(c->skb)->nr_frags, nr);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, folio_ref_count(c->folio), (int)nr + 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, skb_copy_bits(c->skb, 0, copy, len), 0);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, copy, data, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (__force u16)csum_fold(c->skb->csum),
+ (__force u16)csum_fold(csum_partial(data, len, 0)));
+ splice_basic_free_skb(c);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, folio_ref_count(c->folio), 1);
+ }
+}
+
+static void skb_splice_basic_progress(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ unsigned int bvec;
+
+ for (bvec = 0; bvec < 2; bvec++) {
+ struct splice_basic *c = splice_basic_new(test);
+ void *bad = kunit_kmalloc(test, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
+ struct bio_vec bv[2];
+ struct iov_iter iter, expected;
+ struct kvec kv[2];
+ ssize_t ret = 0;
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bad);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, PageSlab(virt_to_page(bad)));
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[0], &c->folio->page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ splice_basic_iter(&iter, bv, kv, 1, bvec);
+ expected = iter;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, skb_splice_from_iter(c->skb, &iter, 0), 0);
+ splice_basic_expect_iter(test, &iter, &expected);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, c->skb->len, 0U);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, folio_ref_count(c->folio), 1);
+
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[0], virt_to_page(bad), 16, offset_in_page(bad));
+ splice_basic_iter(&iter, bv, kv, 1, bvec);
+ expected = iter;
+ kunit_warning_suppress(test) {
+ ret = skb_splice_from_iter(c->skb, &iter, 16);
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, (ssize_t)-EIO);
+ splice_basic_expect_iter(test, &iter, &expected);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, skb_shinfo(c->skb)->nr_frags, 0);
+
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[0], &c->folio->page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+ bvec_set_page(&bv[1], virt_to_page(bad), 16, offset_in_page(bad));
+ splice_basic_iter(&iter, bv, kv, 2, bvec);
+ expected = iter;
+ iov_iter_advance(&expected, PAGE_SIZE);
+ kunit_warning_suppress(test) {
+ ret = skb_splice_from_iter(c->skb, &iter, PAGE_SIZE + 16);
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, (ssize_t)PAGE_SIZE);
+ splice_basic_expect_iter(test, &iter, &expected);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, c->skb->len, (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, folio_ref_count(c->folio), 2);
+ splice_basic_free_skb(c);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, folio_ref_count(c->folio), 1);
+ }
+}
+
static struct kunit_case net_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(skb_splice_basic_append),
+ KUNIT_CASE(skb_splice_basic_progress),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(gso_test_func, gso_test_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(ip_tunnel_flags_test_run,
ip_tunnel_flags_test_gen_params),
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 11:23 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net: streamline skb_splice_from_iter() Alex Markuze
2026-11-10 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: preserve splice iterator progress on rejection Alex Markuze
2026-11-10 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/4] net: skb_splice_from_iter(): group consecutive pages of a folio Alex Markuze
2026-11-10 11:23 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] net: skb_splice_from_iter(): walk ITER_BVEC segments directly Alex Markuze
2026-11-10 11:23 ` Alex Markuze [this message]
2026-11-10 11:26 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net: streamline skb_splice_from_iter() netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110112325.3263078-5-amarkuze@redhat.com \
--to=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®