From: Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com>
To: Brian Ellis via B4 Relay <devnull+brianellis.gotenna.com@kernel.org>
Cc: brianellis@gotenna.com, Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: apply XCVRDLY after PHY init
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:32:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110143258.5599b138@ingpc2.intern.lauterbach.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110142806.6c3aed36@ingpc2.intern.lauterbach.com>
Hello Brian,
> This very likely depends on how exactly you use the USB344x.
> On my board I am using a USB3346 with the circuit described in
>
> https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/OTH/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/00001880A.pdf
>
> Figure 8-1 USB333X DEVICE APPLICATION DIAGRAM
> (CONFIGURED FOR ULPI CLOCK OUTPUT MODE)
>
> What kind of circuit does your board use?
I am sorry that was the wrong PDF :-(
https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/UNG/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/USB334x-Data-Sheet-DS00002646A.pdf
FIGURE 8-1: USB3341, USB3346, AND USB3347 APPLICATION DIAGRAM
(DEVICE CONFIGURED FOR ULPI CLOCK OUTPUT MODE)
with best regards
Ingo
On Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:28:06 +0100
Ingo Rohloff <ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com> wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> > Each link enumerates at 480 Mbps and passes traffic,
> > then drops 2.20-2.23 s after enumeration, and the host's
> > attempts to re-enumerate the device fail.
>
> I have a hypothesis what the problem is:
> USB 2.0 LPM (Low Power Management).
> Please try the attached patch.
> If this helps: That's the origin why you loose the link.
>
> It seems USB344x + DWC3 don't support USB 2.0 LPM in this combination.
>
> Note: This problem only appears when your HOST USB Controller also
> supports USB 2.0 LPM.
> Meaning: Depending on your exact Host PC you might not see this effect.
> Only recent PCs support USB 2.0 LPM; on my PC here only some specific
> USB ports support USB 2.0 LPM. So on my PC it depends to which USB port
> you connect the device to.
>
>
> > Ingo, if your USB3340 board is still to hand, it would help to know
> > whether its high-speed links stay up for more than a few seconds, with
> > and without this change.
>
> Yes this board is very much on hand ;-)
> The high-speed link there stays up indefinitely.
>
> > Not addressed here: on our board the ULPI ID read that a28de6335657 uses
> > to detect the USB3340 fails when no cable is attached at boot, because
> > this PHY only clocks ULPI with VBUS present, so the bit is never set and
> > the port runs at full speed.
>
> At least for my board this is not the case.
>
> I get a completely stable 60Mhz ULPI clock regardless of if
> VBUS is present or not.
>
> Which of course in turn means the ULPI ID can be read out without
> any problems.
>
> This very likely depends on how exactly you use the USB344x.
> On my board I am using a USB3346 with the circuit described in
>
> https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/OTH/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/00001880A.pdf
>
> Figure 8-1 USB333X DEVICE APPLICATION DIAGRAM
> (CONFIGURED FOR ULPI CLOCK OUTPUT MODE)
>
> What kind of circuit does your board use?
>
> > Fixing that needs a DT property and a binding update, so it is not part of this fix.
>
> That was my original patch proposal: Use a DT property.
> I got push-back on that idea.
> The auto-detection via using the ULPI ID is a lot nicer.
> Of course this doesn't work if you don't have a stable ULPI CLK signal.
>
> > What matters is when the bit is written, not its value. Written at the
> > end of dwc3_core_init() instead, GUSB2PHYCFG holds the same value
> > (0x00022710 on this board), and high-speed links on the same board stay
> > up: one ran continuously for over 1000 s with no receive errors, and 60
> > re-enumeration cycles completed without a failure.
>
> Where did the 60 re-enumeration cycles came from?
> If the link "stays up", then why do you get a re-enumeration?
>
> It might have something to do with what happens with the
> ULPI PHY when USB 2.0 LPM gets active.
> When the host looses the link (which should not happen in the first place)
> because of USB 2.0 LPM, then it re-enumerates.
> Depending on where you put the "dwc3_ulpi_setup(dwc);"
> this re-enumeration after link loss (because of USB 2.0 LPM)
> might then work.
>
> But again the link should not be lost in the first place.
>
> with best regards
> Ingo
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2026 10:22:31 -0700
> Brian Ellis via B4 Relay <devnull+brianellis.gotenna.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Brian Ellis <brianellis@gotenna.com>
> >
> > Commit a28de6335657 ("usb: dwc3: Support USB3340x ULPI PHY high-speed
> > negotiation.") sets GUSB2PHYCFG.XCVRDLY in dwc3_ulpi_setup(), which
> > dwc3_core_init() calls straight after ULPI init. That is before
> > dwc3_core_get_phy(), dwc3_phy_init(), dwc3_core_soft_reset() and
> > dwc3_phy_power_on(), so the bit is already asserted while the PHY is
> > brought up.
> >
> > On a ZynqMP board (DWC3 2.90a, peripheral mode) with a USB3340, that
> > ordering breaks high-speed links. Each link enumerates at 480 Mbps and
> > passes traffic, then drops 2.20-2.23 s after enumeration, and the host's
> > attempts to re-enumerate the device fail. We measured 12 such links on
> > two host root ports; every one died in that window.
> >
> > What matters is when the bit is written, not its value. Written at the
> > end of dwc3_core_init() instead, GUSB2PHYCFG holds the same value
> > (0x00022710 on this board), and high-speed links on the same board stay
> > up: one ran continuously for over 1000 s with no receive errors, and 60
> > re-enumeration cycles completed without a failure.
> >
> > Move the dwc3_ulpi_setup() call to the end of dwc3_core_init(). The bit
> > is still set well before any high-speed chirp, which only happens when a
> > host enumerates the device.
> >
> > Fixes: a28de6335657 ("usb: dwc3: Support USB3340x ULPI PHY high-speed negotiation.")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Ellis <brianellis@gotenna.com>
> > ---
> > How this was tested: not on mainline. The failure and the fix were both
> > measured on our board running AMD's 6.6-based vendor kernel (through
> > ADI's tree), with a28de6335657 backported. The backport calls
> > dwc3_ulpi_setup() from the same place and differs only in handling a
> > single USB2 port. The 12 failing links were attached directly to two
> > host root ports. The 1000 s run was through a hub, on a kernel carrying
> > this change plus five other local dwc3, ULPI and extcon patches. The 60
> > re-enumeration cycles were direct to two root ports, on a later build
> > with more of our local USB fixes. On mainline the change is
> > compile-tested only (x86_64 allmodconfig, W=1, no new warnings).
> >
> > Not established: why the ordering matters. The outcome follows whether
> > XCVRDLY is asserted before dwc3_phy_init(), not the value written, but
> > we have not identified which step of PHY bring-up is sensitive to it.
> >
> > Ingo, if your USB3340 board is still to hand, it would help to know
> > whether its high-speed links stay up for more than a few seconds, with
> > and without this change.
> >
> > Not addressed here: on our board the ULPI ID read that a28de6335657 uses
> > to detect the USB3340 fails when no cable is attached at boot, because
> > this PHY only clocks ULPI with VBUS present, so the bit is never set and
> > the port runs at full speed. Fixing that needs a DT property and a
> > binding update, so it is not part of this fix.
> >
> > Tool use: an LLM coding assistant (Claude) helped run the investigation
> > and keep its record, wrote the code change, and drafted this changelog
> > and these notes from that record. The measurements were taken on our
> > hardware.
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > index fd5c2cd36c..9b37ceda9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > @@ -1371,8 +1371,6 @@ int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > dwc->ulpi_ready = true;
> > }
> >
> > - dwc3_ulpi_setup(dwc);
> > -
> > if (!dwc->phys_ready) {
> > ret = dwc3_core_get_phy(dwc);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -1534,6 +1532,9 @@ int dwc3_core_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > dwc3_writel(dwc, DWC3_GUCTL3, reg);
> > }
> >
> > + /* XCVRDLY must not be asserted across PHY init, so set it last. */
> > + dwc3_ulpi_setup(dwc);
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > err_power_off_phy:
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 3149e8b3237f58d4dd440fc64c45c93404c4b064
> > change-id: 20261109-dwc3-xcvrdly-after-phy-init-509803f4b0c8
> >
> > Best regards,
>
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inform.
Ingo ROHLOFF
Senior Staff Engineer
phone +49 8102 9876-142 - ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com
Lauterbach Engineering GmbH & Co. KG
Altlaufstrasse 40, 85635 Hoehenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn, GERMANY
www.lauterbach.com
Registered Office: Hoehenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn, Germany,
Local Court: Munich, HRA 87406, VAT ID: DE246770537,
Managing Directors: Stephan Lauterbach, Dr. Thomas Ullmann
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 17:22 Brian Ellis via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 13:28 ` Ingo Rohloff
2026-11-10 13:32 ` Ingo Rohloff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110143258.5599b138@ingpc2.intern.lauterbach.com \
--to=ingo.rohloff@lauterbach.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=brianellis@gotenna.com \
--cc=devnull+brianellis.gotenna.com@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®