mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Josef Bacik" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>,
	"Serge Hallyn" <sergeh@kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Bradley Morgan" <brads@mainlining.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] userns: Let LSMs deny the CAP_SETFCAP snapshot for mapping uid 0
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:42:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110144205.2404088-1-mic@digikod.net> (raw)

Commit db2e718a4798 ("capabilities: require CAP_SETFCAP to map uid 0")
records in parent_could_setfcap whether the creator of a user namespace
had CAP_SETFCAP, because a creator writing its own uid_map only has
capabilities in the new namespace.  The snapshot uses cap_raised(), so a
task whose LSM policy denies CAP_SETFCAP can still map uid 0 in a
namespace it creates.

Use security_capable() against the parent namespace instead: the
creator's credentials still belong to it at this point, so commoncap
returns the same result, and only LSM denials are added.

Do not audit this check: creating a user namespace does not use
CAP_SETFCAP, and most namespaces never map uid 0.  The uid_map write
that later fails has no LSM audit record.

Checking CAP_SETFCAP when the map is written would not work: the
writer's credentials then belong to the new namespace, where commoncap
grants the creator all capabilities.

Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: db2e718a4798 ("capabilities: require CAP_SETFCAP to map uid 0")
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
---

This is independent from Josef Bacik's series, which reworks this code
to close other ways around the CAP_SETFCAP rule:
https://patch.msgid.link/20261027-b4-setfcap-userns-v8-0-2674adc63f3c@toxicpanda.com

That series still computes the creator's CAP_SETFCAP with cap_capable()
and cap_raised() in cap_setfcap_level(), so it would need the same
change.
---
 include/linux/user_namespace.h | 5 +++--
 kernel/user_namespace.c        | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
index 91232053775d..370961fde45f 100644
--- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
@@ -86,8 +86,9 @@ struct user_namespace {
 	kgid_t			group;
 	struct ns_common	ns;
 	unsigned long		flags;
-	/* parent_could_setfcap: true if the creator if this ns had CAP_SETFCAP
-	 * in its effective capability set at the child ns creation time. */
+	/* parent_could_setfcap: true if the creator of this ns could use
+	 * CAP_SETFCAP in the parent ns at the child ns creation time.
+	 */
 	bool			parent_could_setfcap;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
index cd748e1cbace..57b7f10be74e 100644
--- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
@@ -128,7 +128,13 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new)
 	if (!ns)
 		goto fail_dec;
 
-	ns->parent_could_setfcap = cap_raised(new->cap_effective, CAP_SETFCAP);
+	/*
+	 * verify_root_map() relies on this once the creator only has
+	 * capabilities in the new namespace.  Let LSMs deny it, but do not
+	 * audit: the creator may never map uid 0.
+	 */
+	ns->parent_could_setfcap =
+		!security_capable(new, parent_ns, CAP_SETFCAP, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT);
 
 	ret = ns_common_init(ns);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.56.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 14:42 Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-11-10 14:51 ` Paul Moore
2026-11-10 15:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2026-11-10 15:51 ` Bradley Morgan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261110144205.2404088-1-mic@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=brads@mainlining.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morgan@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®