From: Gopal Malaviya <gopalmalaviya53@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
fujunjie1@qq.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, tracekotae@gmail.com,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap: restart mmap readahead on sequential faults after many misses
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:40:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110204035.184968-1-gopalmalaviya53@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sashiko-outbox-206717@kernel.org>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 09:15:49AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> - [Medium] mm/filemap: do_sync_mmap_readahead() recovery fails when
> min_order > 0
> - [Medium] mm/filemap: do_sync_mmap_readahead() ignores VM_RAND_READ and
> !ra_pages
> - [Low] mm/filemap: prev_pos == -1 wraps to match pgoff 0 on 32-bit in
> mmap ra
Thanks, all three are right. On XFS with 16 KiB blocks the reproducer
still takes 4096 major faults with this patch, and on a MADV_HUGEPAGE
mapping with MADV_RANDOM it starts readahead anyway. I am testing a v2
that handles both and the 32-bit case, and will send it once the tests
are done.
The page_cache_ra_order() underflow is pre-existing; I will look at it
separately.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 19:25 [REGRESSION] mm/filemap: mmap read-around stays off for an open file after sparse faults, since 7.2 Trace
2026-11-09 9:14 ` [PATCH] mm/filemap: restart mmap readahead on sequential faults after many misses Gopal Malaviya
2026-11-10 13:53 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-206717@kernel.org>
2026-11-10 20:40 ` Gopal Malaviya [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110204035.184968-1-gopalmalaviya53@gmail.com \
--to=gopalmalaviya53@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujunjie1@qq.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=tracekotae@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®