From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To: aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, andreas@kemnade.info, khilman@baylibre.com,
rogerq@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
andi.shyti@kernel.org, thomas.richard@bootlin.com,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: fix omap_device with noirq_suspend
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 22:15:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110211531.679943-1-andreas@kemnade.info> (raw)
Fixes cases where device runtime gets resumed in _suspend but then
pm_runtime_force_suspend is used. So the device is disabled, but runtime
active in _noirq_suspend leading to duplicate runtime_suspend calls. So
rather check for the device state directly to indicate if changes are
needed.
This relies on pm_runtime_force_resume being used in a balanced way.
Fixes: 7da7fd7e66ac9 ("i2c: omap: wakeup the controller during suspend() callback")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
---
This really needs intensive scrutiny but might be a less invasive patch
solution better suited for stable and paves the way to get out of the
omap_device theatre without too much hurry.
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
index 77a75b0b9ae69..52afc9089a5a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
ret = pm_generic_suspend_noirq(dev);
- if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ if (!ret && (od->_state == OMAP_DEVICE_STATE_ENABLED)) {
if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
omap_device_idle(pdev);
od->flags |= OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 21:15 Andreas Kemnade [this message]
2026-11-11 0:22 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110211531.679943-1-andreas@kemnade.info \
--to=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®