From: Qiliang Yuan <qiliang.yuan@linux.dev>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qiliang Yuan <qiliang.yuan@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Avoid re-syncing runtime_enabled on root domain changes
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:24:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111-bug-sched-fair-offline-active-v1-2-4f54523c5a70@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-bug-sched-fair-offline-active-v1-0-4f54523c5a70@linux.dev>
rq_online_fair() calls update_runtime_enabled(), which walks every task
group and takes each group's cfs_bandwidth lock to copy its quota state
into the CPU's cfs_rq. A sched domain rebuild reaches it for every
active CPU through rq_attach_root(), with the rq lock held and
interrupts disabled.
The walk only matters when the cached state may be stale. While a CPU
is online, tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() updates runtime_enabled on it under
the rq lock, and it holds cpus_read_lock() so it cannot miss a CPU that
is coming up. Only unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() clears runtime_enabled
behind its back, and a CPU that has never been online has not been
visited at all.
Track this in a per-rq flag that update_runtime_enabled() sets after
the walk and unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() clears, and skip the walk
while it is set.
With 4000 cpu cgroups on a 32-CPU VM booted with rt_group_sched=0,
switching a 4-CPU cpuset to a partition root and offlining or onlining
one CPU take (median of 20 partition switches and 16 hotplug operations):
operation before (ms) after (ms) change
partition root 7.68 1.21 -84%
cpu offline 30.96 13.44 -57%
cpu online 28.48 12.82 -55%
Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <qiliang.yuan@linux.dev>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e245a31b0544e..e2f67bdc3031e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7798,6 +7798,15 @@ static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+ /*
+ * tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() keeps runtime_enabled up to date while the
+ * CPU is online, so only the first activation and the one following
+ * unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() need the walk.
+ */
+ if (rq->cfsb_runtime_valid)
+ return;
+ rq->cfsb_runtime_valid = true;
+
guard(rcu)();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(tg, &task_groups, list) {
@@ -7816,6 +7825,8 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+ rq->cfsb_runtime_valid = false;
+
/*
* The rq clock has already been updated in the
* set_rq_offline(), so we should skip updating
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1d76950dbb0a1..1a73383204384 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1412,6 +1412,8 @@ struct rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
call_single_data_t cfsb_csd;
struct list_head cfsb_csd_list;
+ /* cfs_rq->runtime_enabled is in sync with the quota of every group */
+ bool cfsb_runtime_valid;
#endif
atomic_t nr_iowait;
--
2.43.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 1:24 [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Cut per-group work from sched domain rebuilds Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-12 1:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Skip rq_offline_fair() work for CPUs that stay active Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-12 1:24 ` Qiliang Yuan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111-bug-sched-fair-offline-active-v1-2-4f54523c5a70@linux.dev \
--to=qiliang.yuan@linux.dev \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®