From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sshegde@linux.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
tglx@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@kernel.org,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arch_topology: Use cpumask_intersects where applicable
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 13:29:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111075945.3930230-6-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111075945.3930230-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Looping over one cpumask and checking if any bit is set in another
cpumask is same as evaluating if two cpumasks intersects or not.
So use cpumask_intersects instead. It is probably faster too.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 8c5e47c28d9a..aba86e9c2516 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -34,14 +34,7 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(capacity_freq_ref);
static bool supports_scale_freq_counters(const struct cpumask *cpus)
{
- int i;
-
- for_each_cpu(i, cpus) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(i, &scale_freq_counters_mask))
- return true;
- }
-
- return false;
+ return cpumask_intersects(cpus, &scale_freq_counters_mask);
}
bool topology_scale_freq_invariant(void)
--
2.52.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 7:59 [PATCH 0/5] cpumask: Use cpumask_intersects* APIs " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-11 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/rt: cpupri_find: Use cpumask_intersects " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-11 7:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpu/hotplug: " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-11 7:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-11 7:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpuidle: Use cpumask_intersects_and " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-11-11 7:59 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111075945.3930230-6-sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®