From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] tick/nohz: Re-evaluate the tick on return to user space
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 12:43:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111114406.346953-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111114406.346953-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
On nohz_full CPUs the tick is re-evaluated on IRQ exit and on idle exit.
This is not enough on return to user space. If the tick is left running in
the kernel, for example because a tick dependency was cleared
(tick_nohz_dep_clear*() don't kick the CPU) or a timer that kept it
running was cancelled, it fires at least once in userspace before
tick_nohz_irq_exit() stops it.
Stop it from context tracking right before resuming userspace. When the
tick is already stopped, the common case, this costs a few flag tests on
each return to userspace.
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 8 ++++++++
kernel/context_tracking.c | 8 ++++++++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index b121c5d53e30..8bfbb053f4fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void);
extern void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
+extern void __tick_nohz_user_enter(void);
#else
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
@@ -294,6 +295,7 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { }
static inline void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
+static inline void __tick_nohz_user_enter(void) { }
#endif
static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
@@ -302,6 +304,12 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
__tick_nohz_task_switch();
}
+static inline void tick_nohz_user_enter(void)
+{
+ if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ __tick_nohz_user_enter();
+}
+
static inline void tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare(void)
{
if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c
index a743e7ffa6c0..347f99e1880f 100644
--- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
+++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <trace/events/rcu.h>
+#include <linux/tick.h>
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct context_tracking, context_tracking) = {
@@ -466,6 +467,13 @@ void noinstr __ct_user_enter(enum ctx_state state)
*/
if (state == CT_STATE_USER) {
instrumentation_begin();
+ /*
+ * On nohz_full CPUs the tick may have been left running in the
+ * kernel, e.g. kept by a tick dependency that is now gone.
+ * Stop it now rather than let it interrupt userspace once
+ * more before the next IRQ exit notices.
+ */
+ tick_nohz_user_enter();
trace_user_enter(0);
vtime_user_enter(current);
instrumentation_end();
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index c6d86e4da8a9..645dba919386 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1071,6 +1071,30 @@ static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
__tick_nohz_full_update_tick(ts, ktime_get());
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
+void __tick_nohz_user_enter(void)
+{
+ struct tick_sched *ts;
+ int cpu;
+
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+ return;
+
+ ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
+ if (!tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_NOHZ))
+ return;
+
+ if (tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_STOPPED))
+ return;
+
+ if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts))
+ tick_nohz_full_stop_tick(ts, cpu);
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* A pending softirq outside an IRQ (or softirq disabled section) context
* should be waiting for ksoftirqd to handle it. Therefore we shouldn't
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 11:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] Stop the idle tick on polling idle on nohz_full CPUs Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 11:43 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/idle: Don't handle polling idle as dynticks idle Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] tick/nohz: Remove tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick() Marco Crivellari
2026-11-11 11:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: no_hz: Add tick stop in polling idle Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111114406.346953-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®