From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] srcu: Rule for using synchronize_srcu_atomic() from interrupt handlers
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:59:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111145949.70845-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111145949.70845-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
This is about the update side. A user that calls
synchronize_srcu_atomic() from an interrupt handler must disable
interrupts around all its calls on that srcu_struct, task context
included. Document this rule, and warn when it is broken. The rules
for readers are unchanged.
synchronize_srcu_atomic() spins rather than sleeps, so it may be called
from atomic context, interrupt handlers included. Its callers on one
srcu_struct exclude each other with ->srcu_atomic_gp_flag. One of them
drives the grace period. The others spin until a grace period ends.
The flag owner disables only preemption. So an interrupt can arrive on
its CPU while it holds the flag. If that interrupt handler calls
synchronize_srcu_atomic() on the same srcu_struct, it spins forever:
CPU 0, task CPU 0, hardirq
synchronize_srcu_atomic()
takes ->srcu_atomic_gp_flag
synchronize_srcu_atomic()
spins until a grace period ends
it never ends: its driver is the
task this interrupt interrupted
Nothing reports it. lockdep cannot, because lock_sync() records no
interrupt state.
synchronize_srcu_atomic() cannot disable interrupts itself. A reader
that disables only preemption may wait for an IPI to the waiter's CPU.
That IPI never runs while the waiter spins with interrupts disabled.
The kernel-doc already lets the caller choose the waiter's context.
It then asks the readers to run in that context, or a stricter one.
So the caller disables interrupts. The existing reader rule then
requires the readers of that srcu_struct to disable interrupts too.
Also store the owner's CPU number plus one in the flag, instead of 1.
A waiter that finds its own CPU as the owner warns once, rather than
hanging silently.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 2b0e2b2d2c18..8075da4b1bb5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -2108,6 +2108,13 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_atomic)
* and srcu_read_unlock_atomic() must be invoked from that same context,
* or one that is even more strict.
*
+ * If synchronize_srcu_atomic() is invoked from an interrupt handler for
+ * a given srcu_struct structure, then for that structure, all calls to
+ * synchronize_srcu_atomic() must be invoked with interrupts disabled,
+ * including those from task context. Its callers take turns to drive a
+ * grace period, and the others spin until it ends. An interrupt handler
+ * that calls it on the CPU of an interrupted caller would spin forever.
+ *
* If synchronize_srcu_atomic() is invoked on a given srcu_struct
* structure, then none of call_srcu(), synchronize_srcu(),
* synchronize_srcu_expedited(), start_poll_synchronize_srcu(),
@@ -2144,7 +2151,13 @@ void synchronize_srcu_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
srcu_state = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
preempt_disable();
while (atomic_read(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag) ||
- atomic_xchg(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 1)) {
+ atomic_cmpxchg(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag, 0,
+ smp_processor_id() + 1)) {
+ // The flag holds its owner's CPU number plus one. An owner on
+ // this CPU is a caller that this one interrupted. It cannot
+ // release the flag, so this caller would spin forever.
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&sup->srcu_atomic_gp_flag) ==
+ smp_processor_id() + 1);
preempt_enable();
if (poll_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp, srcu_state))
return;
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/7] srcu: NMI-safe atomic SRCU readers, and their irqsave forms Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] srcutiny: Do not call synchronize_rcu() from synchronize_srcu_atomic() Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] srcu: Make atomic SRCU readers NMI-safe Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] srcu: Add irqsave variants of the atomic SRCU readers Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] rcutorture: Run NMI-safe SRCU readers from NMI Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] rcutorture: Test the irqsave forms of atomic SRCU readers Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-11 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] rcutorture: Check an atomic SRCU wait within an RCU reader Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111145949.70845-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®