From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.130.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794409198; b=k4Vj/9WyzCRXRq4qr65hOyekZPzso1oXppqA2UdKwHpwkmee8VreU+WbWkGYL4rB7i/s OPNgJi0N6xq3i/KEZqU+kAgiWA8vo9tSNKiHvjNYYPzozhEM0J4JvptRMEXJ86TxMXmqv Q06wyGfBoYclFYukvS339wCHa1oqqpjsz8FD1TZ9EBMUB7Lw0dZA5c6k1Uofo8jKzf8Fw 059D/vK+DRBYGIXhhTIy6NUuf4y4v7pnRh0Gh4ZAzrHxcWMVghOlQrWmkKJTj6pLYM6Yj jXV9Wp1b0J2pgoTN+5hRE3eGckOWkS4RfcP0PG1fkdyk+5rYDINEKn3n5XSHmDb/NeQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794409198; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date: Message-Id:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=GKurPDAOZ+T3nOWa3yKlJpxNDqqn2BpXamQouxQaMNk=; b=qwhGod1JTphniVIaNPMKygarwBx7/3uEoFa0klDMhxbJc0el0BVZ7woNRvxNCClZUWEW +cb9yAPfAwED/uc/htFUtcSP/wDvoUfZBljkiGIha22NubfSr2jfoEPZCo8DtecQNQ3+G 3LO93cPL8l1Wr0Gq/ntRhL1HBEveQzDKr/sWuCaDkaGt0anDc64gdCEfoOGu3zDLI71EF 2UEE0Q1c+Hxq9UKDFj9cLsxc03QNQpjRYuvVE7i9c36nJ1Dfuo5mj58v/aEzbHeXBdDvR OUn57vscWBOfOR8b88oPl2vIzlHp3cZVQ9pRqRwzT7d/uao9H/Tv0jxxeWJbg0wnNdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=efficios.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com; dkim=pass header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtpout1 header.b=FDICFRJu; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.130.18 Received: from smtpout.efficios.com (smtpout.efficios.com [158.69.130.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76254606A33E; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 76254606A33E Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=efficios.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=smtpout1 header.b=FDICFRJu DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=efficios.com; s=smtpout1; t=1794409197; bh=GKurPDAOZ+T3nOWa3yKlJpxNDqqn2BpXamQouxQaMNk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FDICFRJuiDPiXLCjSy6ctJChWLRir4vSR92Nbo8F1ZlKqcBu7QA2WblopfGqeWzo9 qAQ1rfvwyR+rOl5xHWBa0tFgezJ73iA7z2Q0Lkzc93x2qdVZTll6iRsQ+qB8cTZSjb bIipFgzhj0VNfNQ5yDGQhcsU5UeWqWzWdlMJ7qr4cqRdfGVjsVngyxhyvYna97F0L3 i7UNMD8zzRIzgmgnfeYWDhlvYzNaegN7Dw0hnO4FPIhjSMDS4X+36BAivimdyIxO93 NZRSM3mVor/7jA0/EsFJUwcv0Varm/fIY2bCFHd1RGvkkJVB/TXfVi/2DvlHwu3RcR JWbyXgmsn0JZw== Received: from thinkos.internal.efficios.com (mtl.efficios.com [216.120.195.104]) by smtpout.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4jPms951FNzNkj; Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:59:57 -0500 (EST) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: "Paul E . McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , David Woodhouse , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Uladzislau Rezki , Steven Rostedt , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Davidlohr Bueso , Kunwu Chan , Puranjay Mohan , rcu@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 3/7] srcu: Make atomic SRCU readers NMI-safe Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 09:59:45 -0500 Message-Id: <20261111145949.70845-4-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20261111145949.70845-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> References: <20261111145949.70845-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Atomic SRCU readers count themselves with __srcu_read_lock(), whose this_cpu_inc() is not NMI-safe on every architecture. With CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, which lockdep enables, __srcu_check_read_flavor() also warns when an atomic reader runs in NMI. So an NMI handler cannot use atomic SRCU, while a tracer or a BPF program may need to read a structure that atomic SRCU protects. Count atomic readers with __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() instead. They use NMI-safe increments on the architectures that need them, and keep the full barriers that synchronize_srcu_atomic() pairs with. The __srcu_read_lock_fast() helpers have no such barriers: they rely on a grace period that calls synchronize_rcu(), which synchronize_srcu_atomic() cannot do while it spins. Also accept the atomic flavor in NMI in __srcu_check_read_flavor(). Annotate an atomic reader in NMI as a trylock for lockdep, as srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() does. An NMI can interrupt lockdep itself, and lockdep then reports any other acquisition of a lock that a grace period has used. On the architectures that need NMI-safe counters, every atomic reader now pays an atomic increment at lock and at unlock. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- include/linux/srcu.h | 18 ++++++++++++++---- kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h index d4dcaeb83e2b..e3b541ceb8dd 100644 --- a/include/linux/srcu.h +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ int init_srcu_struct_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp); // 0x04 // SRCU-lite is no longer with us. #define SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST 0x04 // srcu_read_lock_fast(), also NMI-safe. #define SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST_UPDOWN 0x08 // srcu_read_lock_fast_updown(). -#define SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC 0x10 // srcu_read_lock_atomic(). +#define SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC 0x10 // srcu_read_lock_atomic(), also NMI-safe. #define SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ALL (SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL | SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI | \ SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST | SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST_UPDOWN | \ SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC) @@ -372,6 +372,9 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) * The lock and matching srcu_read_unlock_atomic() must be invoked on * the same CPU, from the same context; passing the return value to * another task is not permitted for this flavor. + * + * This function is NMI-safe, in a manner similar to + * srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(). */ static inline int srcu_read_lock_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires_shared(ssp) @@ -391,8 +394,15 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp) if (in_task()) non_block_start(); srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC); - retval = __srcu_read_lock(ssp); - srcu_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map); + retval = __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(ssp); + /* + * An NMI may interrupt lockdep itself. Annotate it as a trylock + * there, as srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() does. + */ + if (in_nmi()) + rcu_try_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map); + else + srcu_lock_acquire(&ssp->dep_map); return retval; } @@ -599,7 +609,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock_atomic(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1); srcu_check_read_flavor(ssp, SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC); srcu_lock_release(&ssp->dep_map); - __srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx); + __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(ssp, idx); if (in_task()) non_block_end(); preempt_enable(); diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c index 8075da4b1bb5..8fa366861dcc 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c @@ -828,7 +828,8 @@ void __srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor) /* NMI-unsafe use in NMI is a bad sign, as is multi-bit read_flavor values. */ WARN_ON_ONCE(read_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI && - read_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST && in_nmi()); + read_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_FAST && + read_flavor != SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ATOMIC && in_nmi()); WARN_ON_ONCE(read_flavor & (read_flavor - 1)); sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda); -- 2.47.3