From: Ian Bridges <icb@fastmail.org>
To: jan.koester@tuxist.de
Cc: linkinjeon@kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, tom@talpey.com,
chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Bridges <icb@fastmail.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] ksmbd: keep named ACL entries effective when a DACL sets a POSIX ACL
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 10:02:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111160235.4127613-1-icb@fastmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13deb997dee36bdc7f75e2ae@groupi3>
Hi Jan,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 09:02:33AM +0000, Jan Koester wrote:
> + fattr->cf_mode = (fattr->cf_mode & ~0070) |
> + (acl_state.mask.allow << 3);
set_info_sec() seems to only log a failed set_posix_acl() and carry
on, after ksmbd_vfs_remove_acl_xattrs() has removed the old ACL. With
this change, would the chmod that follows then set the group bits to
rwx on a file that has no ACL left, giving the owning group rwx in the
file system?
Could the mode be set first, with the owning group's permissions in
cf_mode rather than the mask? A successful set_posix_acl() would then
set the group bits from the mask entry. Should a failed
set_posix_acl() also be returned rather than only logged?
Thanks,
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 9:02 Jan Koester
2026-11-11 16:02 ` Ian Bridges [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-28 6:19 [RFC PATCH 0/6] ksmbd: Windows SIDs for user and group ids Jan Koester
2026-10-28 6:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] ksmbd: keep named ACL entries effective when a DACL sets a POSIX ACL Jan Koester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111160235.4127613-1-icb@fastmail.org \
--to=icb@fastmail.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com \
--cc=jan.koester@tuxist.de \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®