mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stjepan Poljak <stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>,
	"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] virtio_ring: reject a split ring size that is not a power of two again
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 18:29:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111172947.3579982-2-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111172947.3579982-1-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>

The split ring indexes its avail and used rings with num - 1 as a mask,
so its size must be a power of two. Commit 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add
improved queue allocation API") moved that check from
vring_new_virtqueue() into the new allocation path, which
vring_new_virtqueue() does not use.

remoteproc calls vring_new_virtqueue() with a ring size from the
firmware, checked only to be non-zero. With 100 entries, for example,
the driver would put buffers 4 and 8 in avail slot 0. The device would
look for them at slots 4 and 8, possibly reading the wrong data.

Put the check back for the split ring; the packed ring has no such
restriction.

Fixes: 2a2d1382fe9d ("virtio: Add improved queue allocation API")
Signed-off-by: Stjepan Poljak <stjepan.poljak@gmail.com>
---
remoteproc still reports this as -ENOMEM, although the "Bad virtqueue
length" warning names the cause. Returning an error pointer from
vring_new_virtqueue() is left for later; the same change for
vring_create_virtqueue() is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261106055635.3019889-1-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index f683a2d6a200..8da9bd0e70f4 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -3513,6 +3513,12 @@ struct virtqueue *vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
 						    name, map);
 	}
 
+	/* The split ring indexes its rings with num - 1 as a mask. */
+	if (!is_power_of_2(num)) {
+		dev_warn(&vdev->dev, "Bad virtqueue length %u\n", num);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	vring_init(&vring_split.vring, num, pages, vring_align);
 	return __vring_new_virtqueue_split(index, &vring_split, vdev, weak_barriers,
 				     context, notify, callback, name,

base-commit: 1a577f9402c1780cc1e663f48d5dd54c02051b09
-- 
2.53.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11 17:29 [PATCH 0/2] " Stjepan Poljak
2026-11-11 17:29 ` Stjepan Poljak [this message]
2026-11-11 17:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] tools/virtio: vringh_test: check that a split ring must be a power of two Stjepan Poljak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261111172947.3579982-2-stjepan.poljak@gmail.com \
    --to=stjepan.poljak@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®