mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] userns: security: Inform LSMs of capability check during userns creation
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:58:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111205814.3282968-1-bradley.morgan@linux.dev> (raw)

Right now security_capable() gets called in create_user_ns() to snapshot
whether the parent could setfcap, but the LSM gets zero context on where
the check actually came from. It is the same story as setid: without a
dedicated flag, security modules cannot tell this apart from regular
capability checks.

Add CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE and pass it along from create_user_ns().

Suggested-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-kommt-gischt-ohnedies-469998d2f219@brauner/
Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
---
Thanks Christian for the suggestion :).
---
 include/linux/security.h | 2 ++
 kernel/user_namespace.c  | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 40831fab54709..d24666a0b4833 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct nsset;
 #define CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT BIT(1)
 /* If capable is being called by a setid function */
 #define CAP_OPT_INSETID BIT(2)
+/* Is capable being called from the user namespace creation path? */
+#define CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE BIT(3)
 
 /* LSM Agnostic defines for security_sb_set_mnt_opts() flags */
 #define SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS	1
diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
index 57b7f10be74e1..37480f6d8369f 100644
--- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new)
 	 * audit: the creator may never map uid 0.
 	 */
 	ns->parent_could_setfcap =
-		!security_capable(new, parent_ns, CAP_SETFCAP, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT);
+		!security_capable(new, parent_ns, CAP_SETFCAP,
+				  CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT | CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE);
 
 	ret = ns_common_init(ns);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.53.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261111205814.3282968-1-bradley.morgan@linux.dev \
    --to=bradley.morgan@linux.dev \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®