From: Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] userns: security: Inform LSMs of capability check during userns creation
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:58:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261111205814.3282968-1-bradley.morgan@linux.dev> (raw)
Right now security_capable() gets called in create_user_ns() to snapshot
whether the parent could setfcap, but the LSM gets zero context on where
the check actually came from. It is the same story as setid: without a
dedicated flag, security modules cannot tell this apart from regular
capability checks.
Add CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE and pass it along from create_user_ns().
Suggested-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261111-kommt-gischt-ohnedies-469998d2f219@brauner/
Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <bradley.morgan@linux.dev>
---
Thanks Christian for the suggestion :).
---
include/linux/security.h | 2 ++
kernel/user_namespace.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 40831fab54709..d24666a0b4833 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct nsset;
#define CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT BIT(1)
/* If capable is being called by a setid function */
#define CAP_OPT_INSETID BIT(2)
+/* Is capable being called from the user namespace creation path? */
+#define CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE BIT(3)
/* LSM Agnostic defines for security_sb_set_mnt_opts() flags */
#define SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS 1
diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
index 57b7f10be74e1..37480f6d8369f 100644
--- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
+++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
@@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new)
* audit: the creator may never map uid 0.
*/
ns->parent_could_setfcap =
- !security_capable(new, parent_ns, CAP_SETFCAP, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT);
+ !security_capable(new, parent_ns, CAP_SETFCAP,
+ CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT | CAP_OPT_USERNS_CREATE);
ret = ns_common_init(ns);
if (ret)
--
2.53.0
reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261111205814.3282968-1-bradley.morgan@linux.dev \
--to=bradley.morgan@linux.dev \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®