From: "Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <apopple@nvidia.com>,
<balbirs@nvidia.com>, <david@kernel.org>,
<muchun.song@linux.dev>, <osalvador@suse.de>, <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 19:28:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112112816.55095-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> (raw)
This series speeds up the fallback initialization path for HugeTLB tail
struct pages during boot-time hugepage allocation, when HugeTLB vmemmap
optimization (HVO) is unavailable or fails.
Patch 1 factors the PFN-dependent template refresh from the ZONE_DEVICE
template-copy path into memmap_init_refresh_pfn_fields(). The
ZONE_DEVICE path keeps its memcpy_nontemporal() copy primitive.
Patch 2 adds a HugeTLB-specific copy helper in
hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(): initialize the first tail page
normally, then initialize the remaining tail pages by copying that page
with memcpy() and refreshing only PFN-dependent fields in the destination
page.
In the earlier discussion, Mike asked whether the same kind of
template-based initialization also helps the ordinary struct page
initialization path:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/akfB6Qe-jKDEMUxz@kernel.org/
I tested that direction as well, but did not see a measurable benefit
for ordinary struct page initialization. The measurable improvement I
could find is in the HugeTLB bootmem hugepage tail path, where gigantic
pages can require initializing a large number of tail struct pages when
HVO does not cover the allocation.
Tested on a v7.4-rc2 base with 4K base pages and 64 boot-time 1G
hugepages, measured with a temporary jiffies-based printk. HVO is
unavailable on arm64; on x86-64, hugetlb_free_vmemmap=off was used to
exercise the fallback path.
arch base with this patch reduction
arm64 360.8 ms 256.0 ms 29.05%
x86-64 171.0 ms 165.0 ms 3.51%
I also checked memcpy_nontemporal() for the HugeTLB helper, but it did
not show a similar optimization to the PMEM/ZONE_DEVICE template-copy
path. One likely reason is that HugeTLB initializes tail struct pages in
per-hugepage chunks, while the ZONE_DEVICE path is closer to a long
streaming initialization over a device range. In this HugeTLB fallback
path, the measured x86-64 result was better with memcpy(), so this series
keeps memcpy_nontemporal() in the ZONE_DEVICE helper and uses memcpy() in
the HugeTLB helper.
The temporary measurement instrumentation is not part of this series.
Li Zhe (2):
mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_refresh_pfn_fields()
mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/mm_init.c | 11 ++++++-----
mm/mm_init.h | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261110114859.76343-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105120615.16817-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com/#t
Changes in v3:
- Share only the PFN-dependent template refresh. Keep
memcpy_nontemporal() in the ZONE_DEVICE helper and use memcpy() in
the HugeTLB helper.
- Copy HugeTLB tail pages from the first initialized tail page and
refresh PFN-dependent fields in the destination, avoiding a local
template in the HugeTLB helper.
- Restore the empty-range guard in hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
after Sashiko reported a valid powerpc 8xx case.
Changes in v2:
- Add a comment for the template-before-copy ordering, as suggested by
Muchun Song.
- Drop the empty-range guard in hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()
as suggested by Balbir Singh and Mike Rapoport.
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 11:28 Li Zhe [this message]
2026-11-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_refresh_pfn_fields() Li Zhe
2026-11-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
2026-11-12 16:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112112816.55095-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®