mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
To: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <alex@shazbot.org>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	<kbusch@meta.com>, <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
	<satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>, <sonangp@nvidia.com>,
	<ankita@nvidia.com>, <nathanc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>,
	<skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 06/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for BAR and ROM accesses
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:16:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112141632.918954-7-skolothumtho@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112141632.918954-1-skolothumtho@nvidia.com>

Recovery needs to wait for hardware reads and writes to finish before
changing device state. Use access ops for individual MMIO and PIO
reads and writes, covering BAR, VGA, port-I/O and ioeventfd accesses.
Keep copies to and from userspace outside SRCU.

For ROM reads, keep mapping, reading into the buffer and unmapping within
one SRCU read-side section. Copy the buffered data to userspace afterward.

Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
index 10cd091031fe..8494e93c18fb 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
@@ -40,57 +40,81 @@
 #define vfio_ioread8	ioread8
 #define vfio_iowrite8	iowrite8
 
-#define VFIO_IOWRITE(size) \
-int vfio_pci_core_iowrite##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,	\
-			bool test_mem, u##size val, void __iomem *io)	\
-{									\
-	if (test_mem) {							\
-		down_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
-		if (!__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) {			\
-			up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);			\
-			return -EIO;					\
-		}							\
-	}								\
-									\
-	vfio_iowrite##size(val, io);					\
-									\
-	if (test_mem)							\
-		up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
-									\
-	return 0;							\
-}									\
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_iowrite##size);
-
-VFIO_IOWRITE(8)
-VFIO_IOWRITE(16)
-VFIO_IOWRITE(32)
-VFIO_IOWRITE(64)
-
-#define VFIO_IOREAD(size) \
-int vfio_pci_core_ioread##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,	\
-			bool test_mem, u##size *val, void __iomem *io)	\
-{									\
-	if (test_mem) {							\
-		down_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
-		if (!__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) {			\
-			up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);			\
-			return -EIO;					\
-		}							\
-	}								\
-									\
-	*val = vfio_ioread##size(io);					\
-									\
-	if (test_mem)							\
-		up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
-									\
-	return 0;							\
-}									\
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_ioread##size);
-
-VFIO_IOREAD(8)
-VFIO_IOREAD(16)
-VFIO_IOREAD(32)
-VFIO_IOREAD(64)
+struct vfio_pci_io_access {
+	bool test_mem;
+	void __iomem *io;
+	void *val;
+};
+
+#define VFIO_IOWRITE(size, type)						\
+static long vfio_pci_access_iowrite##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,	\
+					       void *data)			\
+{										\
+	struct vfio_pci_io_access *access = data;				\
+	type *val = access->val;						\
+										\
+	if (access->test_mem) {							\
+		down_read(&vdev->memory_lock);					\
+		if (!__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) {				\
+			up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
+			return -EIO;						\
+		}								\
+	}									\
+										\
+	vfio_iowrite##size(*val, access->io);					\
+	if (access->test_mem)							\
+		up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);					\
+	return 0;								\
+}										\
+										\
+int vfio_pci_core_iowrite##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,		\
+			 bool test_mem, type val, void __iomem *io)		\
+{										\
+	struct vfio_pci_io_access access = { test_mem, io, &val };		\
+										\
+	return vfio_pci_core_access(vdev, vfio_pci_access_iowrite##size, &access);	\
+}										\
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_iowrite##size)
+
+VFIO_IOWRITE(8, u8);
+VFIO_IOWRITE(16, u16);
+VFIO_IOWRITE(32, u32);
+VFIO_IOWRITE(64, u64);
+
+#define VFIO_IOREAD(size, type)							\
+static long vfio_pci_access_ioread##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,	\
+					       void *data)			\
+{										\
+	struct vfio_pci_io_access *access = data;				\
+	type *val = access->val;						\
+										\
+	if (access->test_mem) {							\
+		down_read(&vdev->memory_lock);					\
+		if (!__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) {				\
+			up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);				\
+			return -EIO;						\
+		}								\
+	}									\
+										\
+	*val = vfio_ioread##size(access->io);					\
+	if (access->test_mem)							\
+		up_read(&vdev->memory_lock);					\
+	return 0;								\
+}										\
+										\
+int vfio_pci_core_ioread##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,		\
+			 bool test_mem, type *val, void __iomem *io)		\
+{										\
+	struct vfio_pci_io_access access = { test_mem, io, val };		\
+										\
+	return vfio_pci_core_access(vdev, vfio_pci_access_ioread##size, &access);	\
+}										\
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_ioread##size)
+
+VFIO_IOREAD(8, u8);
+VFIO_IOREAD(16, u16);
+VFIO_IOREAD(32, u32);
+VFIO_IOREAD(64, u64);
 
 #define VFIO_IORDWR(size)						\
 static int vfio_pci_iordwr##size(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,\
@@ -200,12 +224,20 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool test_mem,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw);
 
-static ssize_t vfio_pci_rom_read(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
-				 char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t pos)
+struct vfio_pci_rom_access {
+	size_t count;
+	loff_t pos;
+	void *data;
+	size_t length;
+};
+
+static long vfio_pci_access_rom(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, void *arg)
 {
+	struct vfio_pci_rom_access *access = arg;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
 	bool rom_bar = pci_resource_start(pdev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE);
-	size_t size, length = 0, done = 0;
+	size_t count = access->count, size, length = 0, done = 0;
+	loff_t pos = access->pos;
 	void *data = NULL;
 	void __iomem *io;
 	ssize_t ret;
@@ -272,6 +304,22 @@ static ssize_t vfio_pci_rom_read(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
 		iounmap(io);
 out_unlock:
 	up_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
+	access->data = data;
+	access->length = length;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t vfio_pci_rom_read(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev,
+				 char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t pos)
+{
+	struct vfio_pci_rom_access access = { .count = count, .pos = pos };
+	size_t length, done;
+	void *data;
+	ssize_t ret;
+
+	ret = vfio_pci_core_access(vdev, vfio_pci_access_rom, &access);
+	data = access.data;
+	length = access.length;
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_free;
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 14:16 [RFC PATCH v3 00/20] vfio/pci: Handle PCI error recovery and report state to userspace Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/20] vfio/pci: Add SRCU-protected access ops Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/20] PCI/PM: Add a power-state helper that tries the bus lock Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/20] vfio/pci: Avoid waiting for the bus lock when preparing D0 Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for config-space accesses Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/20] vfio/pci: Buffer ROM reads before copying to userspace Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` Shameer Kolothum [this message]
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops when mapping BAR pages Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for hardware IRQ operations Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for function reset Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for runtime-PM requests Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for hardware information queries Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for DMA-BUF export and restoration Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/20] vfio/pci: Track PCI recovery state Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/20] vfio/pci: Add INTx recovery operations Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/20] vfio/pci: Use access ops for SR-IOV configuration and shared reset Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/20] vfio/pci: Restore device state from slot_reset() Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 17/20] vfio/pci: Complete recovery in resume() Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 18/20] vfio/pci: Block device access during host recovery Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 19/20] vfio/pci: Add VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PCI_ERROR_RECOVERY Shameer Kolothum
2026-11-12 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH v3 20/20] vfio/pci: Enable recovery for supported native PCIe endpoints Shameer Kolothum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261112141632.918954-7-skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    --to=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kbusch@meta.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nathanc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
    --cc=sonangp@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®