From: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <nh-open-source@amazon.com>,
Fahad Mubeen <fmubeen@amazon.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Misha Karataiev <karataev@amazon.com>,
Hendrik Borghorst <hborghor@amazon.de>,
Ibrahim Elshahed <lshahed@amazon.de>,
Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] sched/core: Keep a sibling's DL server link in the core-wide pick
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:15:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112161548.78189-3-sieberf@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112161548.78189-1-sieberf@amazon.com>
The core-wide selection records in rq_i->core_dl_server the DL server
each sibling's pick came through, then clears it for every sibling in
the cookie matching loop, including when the pick is kept. The sibling
takes the fast path, which sets rq->dl_server from rq->core_dl_server,
and runs the task its server picked with p->dl_server NULL. Only the
selecting CPU keeps the link, as its pick goes through rq->dl_server.
A running task is ranked for core scheduling by p->dl_server. While
such a task runs on a sibling, each following core-wide selection
ranks it as a plain fair or ext task rather than by its server's
deadline, so a higher class task on another sibling takes the core
back before the server's runtime is used. The RV nomiss monitor, which
follows the server through next->dl_server at sched_switch, does not
see the server run either.
Keep the server that pick_task() left in rq_i->dl_server. With the
previous patch it is NULL when the class pick was replaced. Drop the
assignment in the first loop, which the matching loop always
overwrites.
Fixes: bd9bbc96e835 ("sched: Rework dl_server")
Signed-off-by: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f7ac13186ee59..61d4e6e990bba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6431,7 +6431,6 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
}
rq_i->core_pick = p;
- rq_i->core_dl_server = rq_i->dl_server;
if (!max || prio_less(max, p, fi_before))
max = p;
@@ -6462,7 +6461,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
}
rq_i->core_pick = p;
- rq_i->core_dl_server = NULL;
+ rq_i->core_dl_server = rq_i->dl_server;
if (p == rq_i->idle) {
if (rq_i->nr_running) {
--
2.47.3
Amazon Development Centre (South Africa) (Proprietary) Limited
29 Gogosoa Street, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, 7925, South Africa
Registration Number: 2004 / 034463 / 07
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 16:15 [PATCH 0/5] sched: Fix DL server starvation under core scheduling Fernand Sieber
2026-11-12 16:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/core: Clear stale rq->dl_server when core-sched replaces a pick Fernand Sieber
2026-11-12 16:15 ` Fernand Sieber [this message]
2026-11-12 16:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/core: Rank DL server picks as deadline in the core-wide pick Fernand Sieber
2026-11-12 16:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/deadline: Don't charge core-sched forced idle to the DL servers Fernand Sieber
2026-11-12 16:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/sched: Add a core-sched forced-idle DL server test Fernand Sieber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112161548.78189-3-sieberf@amazon.com \
--to=sieberf@amazon.com \
--cc=bristot@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=fmubeen@amazon.de \
--cc=hborghor@amazon.de \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=karataev@amazon.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lshahed@amazon.de \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nh-open-source@amazon.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®