From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>, Suyash Mahar <smahar@meta.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] coresight: etm-perf: Serialize AUX topology access
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:09:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112180920.GM9176@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016-james-cs-multiple-per-threads-v4-3-dedf961aca0e@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 11:46:13AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> Perf AUX setup walks the CoreSight connections to select a sink, build
> paths and acquire references to the devices and their helpers. Unlike
> sysfs tracing, it does not hold coresight_mutex. Driver registration and
> removal can therefore change or free connections while setup walks them.
> Adding a CTI helper can also reallocate an existing device's output
> connection array even when the device is already referenced by a path.
I agree that bus traversal and devices acquisition need protection.
> Hold coresight_mutex from sink selection through buffer allocation.
> The allocation must also be protected because ETR buffers can look up a
> connected CATU. Release the mutex before calling etm_free_aux() on error.
However, my concern is about the locking semantics. We should clearly
identify the races that coresight_mutex is intended to protect and
limit its usage accordingly. My understanding is that coresight_mutex
primarily protects CoreSight bus operations.
Holding it across the entire perf AUX setup might silence AI review
warnings, but it may abuse the lock and hide synchronization issues in
the CoreSight core APIs. OTOH, I'd say SysFS mode should not acquire
such a big lock as well.
BTW, I think this change is a distraction from the per-thread fixes.
My understanding is that this series aims to fix multithreading with
a shared sink, so we can address device lifetime issues separately.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 10:46 [PATCH v4 00/10] coresight: Prevent per-thread events from sharing a sink James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: configfs: Don't assume active until cscfg_mgr is set James Clark
2026-10-28 10:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-28 13:00 ` James Clark
2026-11-12 17:10 ` Leo Yan
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] coresight: etm-perf: Remove workqueue for freeing AUX data James Clark
2026-11-12 17:13 ` Leo Yan
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] coresight: etm-perf: Serialize AUX topology access James Clark
2026-11-12 18:09 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] coresight: etm-perf: Reject event if building path fails James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] coresight: etm-perf: Prevent sink sharing at setup time James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] coresight: tmc-etr: Reflect new sharing rules in allocator James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] coresight: tmc-etr: Remove sharing guards from ETR James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] coresight: tmc-etf: Remove sharing guards from ETF James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] coresight: etb10: Remove sharing guards from ETB10 James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] coresight: ultrasoc-smb: Remove sharing guards from SMB James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112180920.GM9176@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=smahar@meta.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®