From: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@google.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley"
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] usb: uas: fail command submission on fatal USB errors
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 18:49:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113024922.27977-3-sarthakkukreti@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113024922.27977-1-sarthakkukreti@google.com>
uas_queuecommand_lck() only treats -ENODEV from uas_submit_urbs() as a
fatal submission error. When a link drops or an endpoint is disabled
while hub_wq is frozen, usb_submit_urb() can also fail with -ESHUTDOWN,
-ENOENT, or -EHOSTUNREACH, causing uas_queuecommand_lck() to return
SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY or queue retry work. In addition, if status or
data URB submission succeeds before a later URB submission fails,
uas_queuecommand_lck() either leaks unsubmitted URBs and orphans the
status URB, or leaves SUBMIT_CMD_URB set and COMMAND_INFLIGHT clear so
the command never completes.
Fail commands with DID_NO_CONNECT on -ESHUTDOWN, -ENOENT, and
-EHOSTUNREACH in uas_queuecommand_lck(), free unsubmitted URBs, and
unlink any already-submitted status or data URBs outside devinfo->lock.
Fixes: 26d56a9fcb20 ("usb: uas: fix urb unmapping issue when the uas device is remove during ongoing data transfer")
Signed-off-by: Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@google.com>
---
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
index 904b4ce04fc6..951d85b2e7ac 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
@@ -756,12 +756,49 @@ static enum scsi_qc_status uas_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
* a command that has finished is a success for the purpose
* of queueing, no matter how fatal the error
*/
- if (err == -ENODEV) {
- if (cmdinfo->state & (COMMAND_INFLIGHT | DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT |
- DATA_OUT_URB_INFLIGHT))
- goto out;
-
+ if (err == -ENODEV || err == -ESHUTDOWN || err == -ENOENT ||
+ err == -EHOSTUNREACH) {
set_host_byte(cmnd, DID_NO_CONNECT);
+ uas_free_unsubmitted_urbs(cmnd);
+ if (cmdinfo->sense_urb ||
+ (cmdinfo->state & (COMMAND_INFLIGHT |
+ DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT |
+ DATA_OUT_URB_INFLIGHT))) {
+ struct urb *sense_urb = usb_get_urb(cmdinfo->sense_urb);
+ struct urb *data_in_urb = NULL;
+ struct urb *data_out_urb = NULL;
+
+ if (cmdinfo->sense_urb)
+ cmdinfo->state |= COMMAND_INFLIGHT;
+ if (cmdinfo->state & DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT)
+ data_in_urb = usb_get_urb(cmdinfo->data_in_urb);
+ if (cmdinfo->state & DATA_OUT_URB_INFLIGHT)
+ data_out_urb = usb_get_urb(cmdinfo->data_out_urb);
+ cmdinfo->state &= ~(SUBMIT_STATUS_URB |
+ ALLOC_DATA_IN_URB |
+ SUBMIT_DATA_IN_URB |
+ ALLOC_DATA_OUT_URB |
+ SUBMIT_DATA_OUT_URB |
+ ALLOC_CMD_URB |
+ SUBMIT_CMD_URB);
+ devinfo->cmnd[idx] = cmnd;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devinfo->lock, flags);
+
+ if (sense_urb) {
+ usb_unlink_urb(sense_urb);
+ usb_put_urb(sense_urb);
+ }
+ if (data_in_urb) {
+ usb_unlink_urb(data_in_urb);
+ usb_put_urb(data_in_urb);
+ }
+ if (data_out_urb) {
+ usb_unlink_urb(data_out_urb);
+ usb_put_urb(data_out_urb);
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
scsi_done(cmnd);
goto zombie;
}
@@ -774,7 +811,6 @@ static enum scsi_qc_status uas_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
uas_add_work(cmnd);
}
-out:
devinfo->cmnd[idx] = cmnd;
zombie:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devinfo->lock, flags);
--
2.56.0.611.g1030f0b940-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 2:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] usb: uas / scsi: fail inflight and queued commands on dead links Sarthak Kukreti
2026-11-13 2:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] usb: uas: complete command on status URB error Sarthak Kukreti
2026-11-13 2:49 ` Sarthak Kukreti [this message]
2026-11-13 2:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: core: do not retry passthrough requests on disconnected targets Sarthak Kukreti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261113024922.27977-3-sarthakkukreti@google.com \
--to=sarthakkukreti@google.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®