From: Mengmeng Zhao <mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Anuj Gupta <anuj1072538@gmail.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
christian.koenig@amd.com, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
asml.silence@gmail.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Li Wang <liwang@kylinos.cn>,
Mengmeng Zhao <zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ext4: Add dma-buf read/write support
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:06:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113070621.273953-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Mengmeng Zhao <zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn>
This series adds dma-buf read/write support for ext4. The dma-buf direct
I/O infrastructure allows dma-buf to be handed to file I/O as an iov_iter,
but currently it only supports raw block devices. To better serve the
GPU-NVMe direct access through normal filesystems, prior work for XFS has
been discussed at [1]. We are also interested in this field and working on
it [2].
The series is based on v7.4-rc2 (7475ea8b5861), which already contains
the common dma-buf direct I/O infrastructure, so it no longer depends on a
separate base tree.
Patches 1-2 carry the block and iomap prerequisites from Nitesh Shetty and
Anuj Gupta:
- bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx in patch 1 was moved to block/bdev.c as
suggested by Christoph.
- iomap_file_init_dma_buf_io_ctx from that series is not carried. ext4
calls bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx directly, and the capability check is
handled by FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO.
The design is:
- FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO marks files that can be the target of dma-buf I/O;
a filesystem sets it at open time for inodes whose data can be reached
without the page cache.
- dma_buf_io_ctx_create() refuses files that lack the flag and checks the
current f_flags for O_DIRECT at registration.
- As F_SETFL can clear O_DIRECT afterwards, the paths that would fall back
to buffered or copied I/O still need per-I/O checks in the callers.
- DAX is rechecked per I/O because it can be enabled after open.
- iomap must not ask for a buffered fallback on behalf of a dma-buf
iterator: -ENOTBLK would be refused by the callers and would turn a
failure into a successful transfer of zero bytes.
Patch 3 keeps the buffered fallback out of dma-buf I/O, patches 4-7 add
the refusals on the common paths and the capability flag, and patch 8
enables ext4.
Known limitation:
1. A dma-buf read that reaches a hole or an unwritten
extent fails as a whole, even when an earlier mapped extent was already
transferred into the buffer, so the caller does not learn how much of the
dma-buf was filled. Reporting the prefix instead would return a short
read, which callers cannot tell apart from the end of the file, and both
the buffered and the direct path normally hide holes by zero-filling.
Probing the mapping before submitting anything would fix it, but that
belongs to the common iomap series.
2. A refused dma-buf I/O reaches the caller as -EOPNOTSUPP through
iomap_dio_set_error(), which also emits an fserror notification even
though no I/O was submitted. The report could be limited to requests
that did submit a bio, since iomap_dio_bio_iter() accounts dio->size at
submission time, but that changes what fserror users see for every iomap
filesystem, so this version leaves it as it is and asks the fserror
maintainers.
Testing:
- io_uring dma-buf suite (udmabuf + REGISTER_BUFFERS_UPDATE + READ_FIXED /
WRITE_FIXED) against ext4 on a PCIe NVMe namespace, all passed.
- xfstests -g quick on ext4 devices: 689 tests ran, 11 reported failures,
all of them environment related, no failure is attributable to this
series.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20261016091919.971295-1-anuj1072538@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260908131545.105987-1-liwang@kylinos.cn/
Changelog:
==========
RFC v2:
- Rebased onto v7.4-rc2 and dropped the dependency on a separate base
tree; the block and iomap prerequisites are patches 1-2.
- Added patch 3, which reports why a dma-buf direct I/O could not be done
instead of asking for a buffered fallback that the callers refuse.
- Split the block changes: patch 4 only factors the integrity check
into a helper, and patch 5 refuses a dma-buf bio in the inline
encryption fallback, which is where the data pages are walked
instead of in blk_mq_submit_bio(). (Christoph)
- Dropped the mm/filemap and iomap_file_buffered_write() guards; the
refusals now happen in the callers that would fall back to buffered
or copied I/O. (Christoph)
- Added the FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO flag and use it to check whether a bdev or
a filesystem can do dma-buf I/O. (Christoph)
RFC v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105065847.196540-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev/
Mengmeng Zhao (6):
iomap: don't ask for a buffered fallback for dma-buf iterators
blk-mq: factor out a dma-buf bio refusal helper
blk-crypto: refuse dma-buf bios in the fallback path
fs: add FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO and require it for dma-buf I/O contexts
dax: refuse dma-buf iterators in dax_iomap_rw()
ext4: support dma-buf registered buffers for direct I/O
Nitesh Shetty (2):
block: factor out bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx()
iomap: add dma-buf direct I/O guards
.../filesystems/iomap/operations.rst | 3 ++
block/bdev.c | 14 ++++++
block/blk-crypto.c | 8 ++++
block/blk-mq.c | 24 ++++++----
block/fops.c | 12 +----
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-io.c | 13 ++++--
fs/dax.c | 4 ++
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 11 +++++
fs/ext4/file.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--
include/linux/blkdev.h | 8 ++++
include/linux/fs.h | 8 +++-
12 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
base-commit: 7475ea8b58616b33c04afb976cf0fbaad9dd63fb
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 7:06 Mengmeng Zhao [this message]
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] block: factor out bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx() Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] iomap: add dma-buf direct I/O guards Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] iomap: don't ask for a buffered fallback for dma-buf iterators Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] blk-mq: factor out a dma-buf bio refusal helper Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] blk-crypto: refuse dma-buf bios in the fallback path Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] fs: add FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO and require it for dma-buf I/O contexts Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] dax: refuse dma-buf iterators in dax_iomap_rw() Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13 7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: support dma-buf registered buffers for direct I/O Mengmeng Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261113070621.273953-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev \
--to=mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=anuj1072538@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®