mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mengmeng Zhao <mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Anuj Gupta <anuj1072538@gmail.com>,
	Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	tytso@mit.edu, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	asml.silence@gmail.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	Li Wang <liwang@kylinos.cn>,
	Mengmeng Zhao <zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] ext4: Add dma-buf read/write support
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:06:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113070621.273953-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev> (raw)

From: Mengmeng Zhao <zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn>

This series adds dma-buf read/write support for ext4. The dma-buf direct
I/O infrastructure allows dma-buf to be handed to file I/O as an iov_iter,
but currently it only supports raw block devices. To better serve the
GPU-NVMe direct access through normal filesystems, prior work for XFS has
been discussed at [1]. We are also interested in this field and working on
it [2].

The series is based on v7.4-rc2 (7475ea8b5861), which already contains
the common dma-buf direct I/O infrastructure, so it no longer depends on a
separate base tree.
Patches 1-2 carry the block and iomap prerequisites from Nitesh Shetty and
Anuj Gupta:
- bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx in patch 1 was moved to block/bdev.c as
suggested by Christoph.
- iomap_file_init_dma_buf_io_ctx from that series is not carried. ext4
calls bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx directly, and the capability check is
handled by FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO.

The design is:
- FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO marks files that can be the target of dma-buf I/O;
  a filesystem sets it at open time for inodes whose data can be reached
  without the page cache.
- dma_buf_io_ctx_create() refuses files that lack the flag and checks the
  current f_flags for O_DIRECT at registration.
- As F_SETFL can clear O_DIRECT afterwards, the paths that would fall back
  to buffered or copied I/O still need per-I/O checks in the callers.
- DAX is rechecked per I/O because it can be enabled after open.
- iomap must not ask for a buffered fallback on behalf of a dma-buf
  iterator: -ENOTBLK would be refused by the callers and would turn a
  failure into a successful transfer of zero bytes.

Patch 3 keeps the buffered fallback out of dma-buf I/O, patches 4-7 add
the refusals on the common paths and the capability flag, and patch 8
enables ext4.

Known limitation: 
1. A dma-buf read that reaches a hole or an unwritten
extent fails as a whole, even when an earlier mapped extent was already
transferred into the buffer, so the caller does not learn how much of the
dma-buf was filled.  Reporting the prefix instead would return a short
read, which callers cannot tell apart from the end of the file, and both
the buffered and the direct path normally hide holes by zero-filling.
Probing the mapping before submitting anything would fix it, but that
belongs to the common iomap series.

2. A refused dma-buf I/O reaches the caller as -EOPNOTSUPP through
iomap_dio_set_error(), which also emits an fserror notification even
though no I/O was submitted.  The report could be limited to requests
that did submit a bio, since iomap_dio_bio_iter() accounts dio->size at
submission time, but that changes what fserror users see for every iomap
filesystem, so this version leaves it as it is and asks the fserror
maintainers.

Testing:
- io_uring dma-buf suite (udmabuf + REGISTER_BUFFERS_UPDATE + READ_FIXED /
  WRITE_FIXED) against ext4 on a PCIe NVMe namespace, all passed.
- xfstests -g quick on ext4 devices: 689 tests ran, 11 reported  failures,
  all of them environment related, no failure is attributable to this 
  series.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20261016091919.971295-1-anuj1072538@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260908131545.105987-1-liwang@kylinos.cn/

Changelog:
==========
RFC v2:
- Rebased onto v7.4-rc2 and dropped the dependency on a separate base
  tree; the block and iomap prerequisites are patches 1-2.
- Added patch 3, which reports why a dma-buf direct I/O could not be done
  instead of asking for a buffered fallback that the callers refuse.
- Split the block changes: patch 4 only factors the integrity check
  into a helper, and patch 5 refuses a dma-buf bio in the inline
  encryption fallback, which is where the data pages are walked
  instead of in blk_mq_submit_bio(). (Christoph)
- Dropped the mm/filemap and iomap_file_buffered_write() guards; the
  refusals now happen in the callers that would fall back to buffered
  or copied I/O. (Christoph)
- Added the FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO flag and use it to check whether a bdev or
  a filesystem can do dma-buf I/O. (Christoph)

RFC v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261105065847.196540-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev/

Mengmeng Zhao (6):
  iomap: don't ask for a buffered fallback for dma-buf iterators
  blk-mq: factor out a dma-buf bio refusal helper
  blk-crypto: refuse dma-buf bios in the fallback path
  fs: add FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO and require it for dma-buf I/O contexts
  dax: refuse dma-buf iterators in dax_iomap_rw()
  ext4: support dma-buf registered buffers for direct I/O

Nitesh Shetty (2):
  block: factor out bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx()
  iomap: add dma-buf direct I/O guards

 .../filesystems/iomap/operations.rst          |  3 ++
 block/bdev.c                                  | 14 ++++++
 block/blk-crypto.c                            |  8 ++++
 block/blk-mq.c                                | 24 ++++++----
 block/fops.c                                  | 12 +----
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-io.c                  | 13 ++++--
 fs/dax.c                                      |  4 ++
 fs/ext4/ext4.h                                | 11 +++++
 fs/ext4/file.c                                | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
 fs/iomap/direct-io.c                          | 41 +++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/blkdev.h                        |  8 ++++
 include/linux/fs.h                            |  8 +++-
 12 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)


base-commit: 7475ea8b58616b33c04afb976cf0fbaad9dd63fb
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13  7:06 Mengmeng Zhao [this message]
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] block: factor out bdev_init_dma_buf_io_ctx() Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] iomap: add dma-buf direct I/O guards Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] iomap: don't ask for a buffered fallback for dma-buf iterators Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] blk-mq: factor out a dma-buf bio refusal helper Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] blk-crypto: refuse dma-buf bios in the fallback path Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] fs: add FMODE_CAN_DMABUF_IO and require it for dma-buf I/O contexts Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] dax: refuse dma-buf iterators in dax_iomap_rw() Mengmeng Zhao
2026-11-13  7:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] ext4: support dma-buf registered buffers for direct I/O Mengmeng Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261113070621.273953-1-mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev \
    --to=mengmeng.zhao@linux.dev \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=anuj1072538@gmail.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwang@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaomengmeng@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®