From: jfern@kernel.org
To: Chris Wiseman <chriswiseman@google.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Tze-nan Wu <Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com>,
Cheng-jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/nocb: Keep lazy timer intact on second lazy callback
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 21:31:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115023115.GA3752240@joelbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18e815d3ba49a353.3137322e32332e3235332e313736.192c60.0000sendgmr@google.com>
On chriswiseman@google.com wrote:
> wake_nocb_gp_defer() checks waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY and
> rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT in one if-statement.
>
> When the first lazy call_rcu() in a NOCB group arms rdp_gp->nocb_timer
> for the 10-second lazy flush delay and sets rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup to
> RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY, the next CPU in the group that queues its first lazy
> callback calls wake_nocb_gp_defer(rdp, RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY, ...). Because
> rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup is no longer RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT, it misses the
> first branch and falls into the else block for RCU_NOCB_WAKE, calling
> mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + 1) and resetting the 10-second
> lazy timer down to 1 jiffy. The same fallthrough also shortens a pending
> 2-jiffy RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS timer to 1 jiffy.
>
> Commit 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power") wrote
> this check against rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup, and commit 463d46044f04
> ("rcu: Fix delayed execution of hurry callbacks") switched it to
> rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, which exposed the fallthrough across all CPUs
> sharing rdp_gp.
>
> Give waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY its own branch and only arm
> nocb_timer when rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup is RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT.
>
> Fixes: 3cb278e73be5 ("rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power")
> Fixes: 463d46044f04 ("rcu: Fix delayed execution of hurry callbacks")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wiseman <chriswiseman@google.com>
Looks reasonable to me. Is there a test case that you added to find this, or any
power savings that you found with this added patch?
thanks,
Joel Fernandes
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> index b6cfee4e5039..347d718befd0 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
> @@ -335,10 +335,12 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
> * Bypass wakeup overrides previous deferments. In case of
> * callback storms, no need to wake up too early.
> */
> - if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY &&
> - rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT) {
> - mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + rcu_get_jiffies_lazy_flush());
> - WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> + if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_LAZY) {
> + if (rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_NOT) {
> + mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer,
> + jiffies + rcu_get_jiffies_lazy_flush());
> + WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> + }
> } else if (waketype == RCU_NOCB_WAKE_BYPASS) {
> mod_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer, jiffies + 2);
> WRITE_ONCE(rdp_gp->nocb_defer_wakeup, waketype);
> --
> 2.52.0.rc1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 2:07 Chris Wiseman
2026-11-15 2:31 ` jfern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115023115.GA3752240@joelbox \
--to=jfern@kernel.org \
--cc=Tze-nan.Wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=chriswiseman@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®