From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <blum@kernel.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>,
Wilson Felipe Pereira <wfelipe@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] init: Combine blacklist entry allocations in initcall_blacklist()
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 07:17:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115071752.ca50507283d1d4cf94631a91@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261115142321.96774-4-blum@kernel.org>
On Sun, 15 Nov 2026 15:23:21 +0100 Thorsten Blum <blum@kernel.org> wrote:
> Use a flexible array member for the function name and allocate it
> together with the blacklist entry. This removes the pointer and saves
> one allocation call per blacklist entry.
>
Looks OK, thanks.
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -1266,7 +1267,7 @@ static void __init do_ctors(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
> struct blacklist_entry {
> struct list_head next;
> - char *buf;
> + char buf[];
> };
We need some care with the flexible arrays. If some code does a struct
copy:
struct blacklist_entry bl1 = bl2;
then the old code would have worked but after this change bl1 has
garbage in its buf[].
afaict none of our static checking tools (gcc, clang, smatch, sparse)
will catch this.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 14:23 [PATCH 1/2] init: Use strscpy() " Thorsten Blum
2026-11-15 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] init: Combine blacklist entry allocations " Thorsten Blum
2026-11-15 15:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115071752.ca50507283d1d4cf94631a91@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=blum@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ekffu200098@gmail.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=wfelipe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®