From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B158B3D9667; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 12:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792327465; cv=none; b=PvAQar03tlYRw4KRrFVxAtchUXua82jOWgnOATdcGSVgN03ruSO2pKKSRdvH1N5YD90nuc1KEpdcR2CevkM5V4xoRo8Q2TvZCVnYbIdQkHLQLaQYDmkANPf8TkdkXY5lt4gHXUiePELwMOeYvshIuLOE+BkmWvrzfMIoeoImmcA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792327465; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ayUEIw5CC/Oo9JP2AH2EBFZlXFxX08FMa3VuTPOlLsM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VUmr0eGd5z9VnBZBF2i0yztdkypwUVW4AdBxl/GmARfvMJj7LaIufc+wGFirNhN3nnjQCzPOsKX46UHWejk4fF9LcPMeQ/63QxGCVpD3mNPkxcTWHQsEimpfU+FgSdso9p1xiA47Iej9BJGGmsyghHp6fFzttGOsf0Z71FGJv0k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=bA/dyefO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.3 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="bA/dyefO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=WMNkipMcwPMTP7cNA2CPWIUSwQ0qxyWJjxciMxCkqng=; b=bA/dyefOAdLU4Vyq/EAH0tER0OuFcZuUW6gEJyj8Po6nRZkJ1R4dtcDNE97wm2 5k7Wgvt9xX08Vl6ucS+gSoX5V5idtKURK524ymH6p+UGIIMgM9GET/ZsLhJMr1WL ZhI/DveznijksLSFKrnkRhAdqMhC4tlyet7QPg5vMi+QE= Received: from [IPV6:2409:8a62:3e8:8320:6021:18bb:3ec8:2069] (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-0 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wD338SqvtRqvbUHBA--.4070S2; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:42:20 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <202f3cb0-a599-44e4-8048-8cbe22b9eaa2@163.com> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 20:42:18 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] pinctrl: stm32: fix hwspinlock timeout and EXTI mux locking To: Linus Walleij Cc: antonio.borneo@foss.st.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, arnd@arndb.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, mfd@lists.linux.dev, rostedt@goodmis.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de References: <20261014160917.139241-2-junan76@163.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Ju Nan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wD338SqvtRqvbUHBA--.4070S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7Jr43Zw4xCF1UGw15GFyfJFb_yoWDWFc_ua ykZa4kCw45Z3W7Ja12yr12kFyS9FZ7tryUJ395W3ZFvr9IvrZrZa95GrZ7tF4Fya95A3Wf Jr9aqryIv342kjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7xRRdWFUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: pmxqt0ixw6il2tof0z/xtbC9QyqXGrUvqzLgwAA3r On 10/16/26 9:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Ju, > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 6:10 PM Ju Nan wrote: > >> This series fixes two problems around the hwspinlock-protected EXTI mux >> and pin configuration accesses in the STM32 pinctrl driver. > > Patches applied for v7.4. > > There are still complaints from Sashiko, but Sashiko always > complains so I'd say at this point we are close to the merge > window so it is better to follow up with separate fixes > if there are more issues. > Thank you for applying the series. Many thanks also to Antonio and Sebastian for taking the time to review the patches; your feedback helped improve the series a lot. > As maintainer I kind of have to decide whether to wait for > the perfect patch or if perfect is the enemy of good and > just merge the patch so the baseline looks better, so I > decided for the latter here. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij I've looked through the remaining Sashiko comments. I'll keep an eye on it and send fixes if anything comes up. Yours, Ju Nan