From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Wei Hu <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][next] RDMA/hns: fix comparison of unsigned long variable 'end' with less than zero
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 18:58:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2046653d-bc90-d287-22a6-b9eaa2740b6e@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531092101.28772-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
在 2019/5/31 17:21, Colin King 写道:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the comparison of end with less than zero is always false
> because end is an unsigned long. Also, replace checks of end with
> non-zero with end > 0 as it is possible that the #defined decrement
> may be changed in the future causing end to step over zero and go
> negative.
>
> The initialization of end with 0 is also redundant as this value is
> never read and is later set to HW_SYNC_TIMEOUT_MSECS, so fix this by
> initializing it with this value to begin with.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: 669cefb654cb ("RDMA/hns: Remove jiffies operation in disable interrupt context")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c
> index 157c84a1f55f..b3641aeff27a 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.c
> @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int hns_roce_set_hem(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> {
> spinlock_t *lock = &hr_dev->bt_cmd_lock;
> struct device *dev = hr_dev->dev;
> - unsigned long end = 0;
> + long end;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct hns_roce_hem_iter iter;
> void __iomem *bt_cmd;
> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int hns_roce_set_hem(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> bt_cmd = hr_dev->reg_base + ROCEE_BT_CMD_H_REG;
>
> end = HW_SYNC_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> - while (end) {
> + while (end > 0) {
> if (!readl(bt_cmd) >> BT_CMD_SYNC_SHIFT)
> break;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> index 1fc77b1f2c6d..e13fea71bcb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_recreate_lp_qp(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
> struct hns_roce_free_mr *free_mr;
> struct hns_roce_v1_priv *priv;
> struct completion comp;
> - unsigned long end = HNS_ROCE_V1_RECREATE_LP_QP_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> + long end = HNS_ROCE_V1_RECREATE_LP_QP_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
>
> priv = (struct hns_roce_v1_priv *)hr_dev->priv;
> free_mr = &priv->free_mr;
> @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_recreate_lp_qp(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
>
> queue_work(free_mr->free_mr_wq, &(lp_qp_work->work));
>
> - while (end) {
> + while (end > 0) {
> if (try_wait_for_completion(&comp))
> return 0;
> msleep(HNS_ROCE_V1_RECREATE_LP_QP_WAIT_VALUE);
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_dereg_mr(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> struct hns_roce_free_mr *free_mr;
> struct hns_roce_v1_priv *priv;
> struct completion comp;
> - unsigned long end = HNS_ROCE_V1_FREE_MR_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> + long end = HNS_ROCE_V1_FREE_MR_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> unsigned long start = jiffies;
> int npages;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_dereg_mr(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>
> queue_work(free_mr->free_mr_wq, &(mr_work->work));
>
> - while (end) {
> + while (end > 0) {
> if (try_wait_for_completion(&comp))
> goto free_mr;
> msleep(HNS_ROCE_V1_FREE_MR_WAIT_VALUE);
> @@ -2425,7 +2425,8 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_clear_hem(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> {
> struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
> struct hns_roce_v1_priv *priv;
> - unsigned long end = 0, flags = 0;
> + unsigned long flags = 0;
> + long end = HW_SYNC_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> __le32 bt_cmd_val[2] = {0};
> void __iomem *bt_cmd;
> u64 bt_ba = 0;
> @@ -2463,7 +2464,6 @@ static int hns_roce_v1_clear_hem(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
>
> bt_cmd = hr_dev->reg_base + ROCEE_BT_CMD_H_REG;
>
> - end = HW_SYNC_TIMEOUT_MSECS;
> while (1) {
> if (readl(bt_cmd) >> BT_CMD_SYNC_SHIFT) {
> if (end < 0) {
Good, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-09 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 9:21 Colin King
2019-05-31 9:21 ` [PATCH 2/2][next] RDMA/hns: fix inverted logic of readl read and shift Colin King
2019-06-07 17:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-07 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/2][next] RDMA/hns: fix comparison of unsigned long variable 'end' with less than zero Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-09 10:58 ` oulijun [this message]
2019-07-24 19:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2046653d-bc90-d287-22a6-b9eaa2740b6e@huawei.com \
--to=oulijun@huawei.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xavier.huwei@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®