Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: Rework acpi_bus_trim()

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Monday, January 14, 2013 02:21:38 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > The next three patches actually rework acpi_bus_trim() in three steps:
> >
> > [3/5] Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim() (all callers pass 1 in there
> >       anyway.
> > [4/5] Reimplement acpi_bus_trim() using acpi_walk_namespace().
> > [3/5] Make acpi_bus_trim() carry out two passes as described above.
> >
> > I'm aware of the fact that this will conflict with the patches that Yinghai
> > posted a few days ago, but in my opinion the changes here are prerequisite for
> > the Yinghai's patchset.
> 
> Sure, I will drop my change to acpi_bus_trim() and update one
> reference accordingly.
> 
> Acked-by: for those 5 patches.

Thanks!

> So you will put those patches in acpi-scan, and Bjorn will pull that
> again to pci tree?

I'm going to put them into acpi-scan some time later this week, but I'd like
them to go through linux-next first to catch teething problems, if any.

I can't speak for Bjorn, though.  I suppose he will pull them if you ask him to.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.