From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751191AbdBWMVW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:21:22 -0500
Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:64581 "EHLO
        cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbdBWMVV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:21:21 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 9908859acaa9 cpuidle/menu: add per CPU PM QoS resume latency consideration
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:15:21 +0100
Message-ID: <2050688.jCOqd8xbcD@aspire.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <47a10932-b485-cf3f-bf39-ccf3026a960f@linaro.org>
References: <1487768197.27533.5.camel@gmx.de> <20170222143910.GV6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <47a10932-b485-cf3f-bf39-ccf3026a960f@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:55:04 PM Alex Shi wrote:
> > 
> > Its not hard; spinlock_t ends up being a mutex, and this is ran from the
> > idle thread. What thread do you think we ought to run when we block
> > idle?
> > 
> 
> Straight right.
> Thanks for explanations! :)

I overlooked that, sorry.

Shall we revert?

I don't want RT to be broken because of this.