From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756926Ab3HZOiJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:38:09 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:35008 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751683Ab3HZOiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:38:07 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Lists linaro-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Query] CPUFreq: Why do we need policy->user_policy? Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:48:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20581731.mdSQ720dHi@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.11.0-rc6+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, August 26, 2013 08:00:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, Hi, > I am almost done with cleanup of drivers and am back at cpufreq core.. :) > I got to this structure: struct cpufreq_real_policy; > > And I am not able to understand what's the need for this structure? > Can you let me know? Before I try to get rid of it :) Honestly, I don't remember from the top of my head. Thanks, Rafael