From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760042AbcLAWVK (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:21:10 -0500 Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.16]:10306 "EHLO fllnx209.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756862AbcLAWVI (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:21:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65086: Fix 25mV ranges for BUCK regulators To: Mark Brown References: <20161201164416.28796-1-afd@ti.com> <20161201221855.4hx4ipzhocepvu53@sirena.org.uk> CC: Liam Girdwood , From: "Andrew F. Davis" Message-ID: <205e4177-a68e-8605-785a-12abb431661d@ti.com> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:21:05 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161201221855.4hx4ipzhocepvu53@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/01/2016 04:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:02:17PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> I just got word that there was a typo in the datasheet, 0x0 really does >> map to 0v out, the above change chunk can be dropped. It looks this >> patch also just got pulled, should I submit a correction patch or can >> this be fixed up locally? > > A followup would be easier if only to make sure I don't make any > mistakes. > Works for me, will send. Andrew