From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM / runtime: Rework pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:28:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2074722.H5Hd6orL2D@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gzAPkHjWEt0Vog+HcbObXSy6nqmsL1_-LT6+F3u7TPSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, January 9, 2018 5:03:18 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > CC usb
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> One of the limitations of pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() is that
> >>>> if a parent driver wants to use these functions, all of its child
> >>>> drivers have to do that too because of the parent usage counter
> >>>> manipulations necessary to get the correct state of the parent during
> >>>> system-wide transitions to the working state (system resume).
> >>>> However, that limitation turns out to be artificial, so remove it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Namely, pm_runtime_force_suspend() only needs to update the children
> >>>> counter of its parent (if there's is a parent) when the device can
> >>>> stay in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition, as
> >>>> that counter is correct already otherwise. Now, if the parent's
> >>>> children counter is not updated, it is not necessary to increment
> >>>> the parent's usage counter in that case any more, as long as the
> >>>> children counters of devices are checked along with their usage
> >>>> counters in order to decide whether or not the devices may be left
> >>>> in suspend after the subsequent system resume transition.
> >>>>
> >>>> Accordingly, modify pm_runtime_force_suspend() to only call
> >>>> pm_runtime_set_suspended() for devices whose usage and children
> >>>> counters are at the "no references" level (the runtime PM status
> >>>> of the device needs to be updated to "suspended" anyway in case
> >>>> this function is called once again for the same device during the
> >>>> transition under way), drop the parent usage counter incrementation
> >>>> from it and update pm_runtime_force_resume() to compensate for these
> >>>> changes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> This patch causes a regression during system resume on Renesas Salvator-XS
> >>> with R-Car H3 ES2.0:
> >>
> >> I have dropped it for now, but we need to address the underlying issue.
> >>
> >>> SError Interrupt on CPU3, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
> >>> SError Interrupt on CPU2, code 0xbf000002 -- SError
> >>> CPU: 3 PID: 1769 Comm: kworker/u16:13 Not tainted
> >>> 4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
> >>> CPU: 2 PID: 1774 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted
> >>> 4.15.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05338-gf14cf570a813c9ca-dirty #97
> >>> Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
> >>> r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
> >>> Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on
> >>> r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT)
> >>> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> >>> Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> >>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
> >>> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
> >>> pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
> >>> pc : rcar_gen3_phy_usb2_init+0x34/0xf8
> >>> lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
> >>> lr : phy_init+0x64/0xcc
> >>> ...
> >>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
> >>>
> >>> Note that before, it printed a warning instead:
> >>>
> >>> Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee0a0200.usb-phy) with
> >>> active children
> >>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1741 at drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1300
> >>> pm_runtime_enable+0x94/0xd8
> >>>
> >>> Reverting commit 0408584d580d4a2c ("PM / runtime: Rework
> >>> pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume()") fixes the crash.
> >>>
> >>> Note that applying Ulf's "[PATCH v2 0/3] phy: core: Re-work runtime PM
> >>> deployment and fix an issue"
> >>> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg21719.html) instead
> >>> does not fix the crash.
> >>
> >> OK
> >>
> >>> With more debug code added, it seems the EHCI module clocks (701-703) are
> >>> enabled earlier than before. I guess this triggers the workqueue to perform
> >>> an operation while another related device (HSUSB 704?) is still disabled?
> >>
> >> Probably.
> >>
> >> Likely a device that wasn't resumed before resumes now and that causes
> >> the issue to appear.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering if adding the ignore_children check to the patch helps.
> >> If not, there clearly is a resume ordering issue that is papered over
> >> by the current code.
> >
> > Something fishy is going on. Status of the USB PHYs differ before/after
> > system suspend, according to /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary:
> >
> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee0a0200.usb-phy active
> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee0c0200.usb-phy active
> > - /devices/platform/soc/ee080200.usb-phy active
> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee0a0200.usb-phy suspended
> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee0c0200.usb-phy suspended
> > + /devices/platform/soc/ee080200.usb-phy suspended
>
> Yeah.
>
> That's because of the pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume() called by
> genpd. These functions generally may cause devices active before
> system suspend to be left in suspend after it. That generally is a
> good idea if the device was not really in use before the system
> suspend, but there is a problem that the driver of it may not be
> prepared for that to happen (and also the way to determine the "not
> really in use" case may not be as expected by the driver).
So below is something to try (untested).
I know that Ulf will be protesting, but that's what I would do unless there
are really *really* good reasons not to.
---
drivers/base/power/domain.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/domain.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -1048,8 +1048,9 @@ static int genpd_finish_suspend(struct d
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
- ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
+ if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
+ !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ ret = genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -1101,8 +1102,12 @@ static int genpd_resume_noirq(struct dev
genpd->suspended_count--;
genpd_unlock(genpd);
- if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
- ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
+ if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
+ !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
ret = pm_generic_resume_noirq(dev);
if (ret)
@@ -1123,7 +1128,7 @@ static int genpd_resume_noirq(struct dev
static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -1135,8 +1140,9 @@ static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct dev
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start)
- ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
+ if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
+ !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
+ ret = genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
return ret;
}
@@ -1151,7 +1157,7 @@ static int genpd_freeze_noirq(struct dev
static int genpd_thaw_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
const struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -1159,8 +1165,9 @@ static int genpd_thaw_noirq(struct devic
if (IS_ERR(genpd))
return -EINVAL;
- if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
- ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
+ if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
+ !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -1193,7 +1200,7 @@ static int genpd_poweroff_noirq(struct d
static int genpd_restore_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
@@ -1217,8 +1224,9 @@ static int genpd_restore_noirq(struct de
genpd_sync_power_on(genpd, true, 0);
genpd_unlock(genpd);
- if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start) {
- ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
+ if (genpd->dev_ops.stop && genpd->dev_ops.start &&
+ !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 0:56 [PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-02 10:51 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-01-02 11:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-02 11:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-02 13:04 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-01-02 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-02 23:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 11:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 6:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-09 12:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 14:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-12 1:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-12 13:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-13 1:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-09 14:27 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-09 14:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-09 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 15:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-09 16:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-01-10 9:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-11 0:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-11 12:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-01-11 18:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-12 11:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-12 12:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 16:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-12 11:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-01-09 18:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-09 19:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2074722.H5Hd6orL2D@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®