From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756825AbaBFRRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:17:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52572 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045AbaBFRRV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:17:21 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20140206120843.5a8b2d7928243f52436ac02c@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20140206120843.5a8b2d7928243f52436ac02c@canb.auug.org.au> To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Huston Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fscache tree Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 17:17:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20893.1391707036@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the fscache tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: Yep. I'd forgotten that branch was in linux-next. I've moved the patches to fscache-experimental so that they don't pester Fengguang either. David