From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753572AbcAMDwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:52:15 -0500 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:57755 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752211AbcAMDwN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:52:13 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee68e-f793c6d00000136c-82-5695c9eb952a Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:52:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Manjeet Pawar Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] meminfo:Don't Account Shared memory in MemAvailable To: David Rientjes Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vaneet Narang , AJEET YADAV , PANKAJ MISHRA Reply-to: manjeet.p@samsung.com MIME-version: 1.0 X-MTR: 20160113034412823@manjeet.p Msgkey: 20160113034412823@manjeet.p X-EPLocale: en_US.windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-EPWebmail-Msg-Type: personal X-EPWebmail-Reply-Demand: 0 X-EPApproval-Locale: X-EPHeader: ML X-MLAttribute: X-RootMTR: 20160113034412823@manjeet.p X-ParentMTR: X-ArchiveUser: X-CPGSPASS: N X-ConfirmMail: N,general Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 MIME-version: 1.0 Message-id: <2098518429.1000641452657131091.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas04d> X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRsSkTvf1yalhBldPGVlc3jWHzYHR4/Mm uQDGKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6MSQv+sBesYq2Y8KadtYFxCmsXIyeHkICKxJSWI2C2hICJxIad n9kgbDGJC/fWA9lcQDVLGSWmNh6CK+paso8JIjGHUWLbT4gEi4CqxK5rf9m7GDk42AR0JJ5+ EQIJCwv4SDzrnMMIYosIaElsWfKJGaSXWWAPo0T79SksEFfIS/SvvMgMYvMKCEqcnPmEBWKZ ksSfzklMEHFliYU3nkNdJyexZOplJgibV2JG+1MWmPi0r2uYIWxpifOzNjDCfLP4+2OoOL/E sds7oHoFJKaeOQhVoy4x59EKqDifxJqFb1lg6nedWs4Ms+v+lrlQNRISW1uegP3OLKAoMaX7 ITuEbSBxZNEcVnS/8Ap4STyZ+IId5HkJgYkcEos+rmSbwKg0C0ndLCSzZiGZhaxmASPLKkbR 1ILkguKk9CIjveLE3OLSvHS95PzcTYzA5HD637O+HYw3D1gfYhTgYFTi4TWYMTVMiDWxrLgy 9xCjKTCeJjJLiSbnA1NQXkm8obGZkYWpiamxkbmlmZI4b4LUz2AhgfTEktTs1NSC1KL4otKc 1OJDjEwcnFINjGwF0+PVBD6v1ZhyVe7kgpqlO/57zZoQcii7ze2m54K/qWx7n6p8PnvDbW63 RW+Qt8anirm2OVfXfbORL32/UWHJu474zRpCe7gChZ3dePUnKmWy7M3/GMFRuZ2Le1Xg+qeT hHk5n743M16x9vypWTJ//hp7uTOZbZLk3S54VTAga/s+vb3b3ZRYijMSDbWYi4oTAWapSvEJ AwAA X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrOKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/tft3XJ6eGGSy+rmlxedccNgdGj8+b 5AIYo9JsMlITU1KLFFLzkvNTMvPSbZW8g+Od403NDAx1DS0tzJUU8hJzU22VXHwCdN0yc4CG KimUJeaUAoUCEouLlfTtbIryS0tSFTLyi0tslaINzY30jAz0TI30DE1jrQwNDIxMgWoS0jIm LfjDXrCKtWLCm3bWBsYprF2MnBxCAioSU1qOgNkSAiYSXUv2MUHYYhIX7q1n62LkAqqZwyix 7echsCIWAVWJXdf+sncxcnCwCehIPP0iBBIWFvCReNY5hxHEFhHQktiy5BMzSC+zwB5Gifbr U1gglslL9K+8yAxi8woISpyc+YQFYpmSxJ/OSUwQcWWJhTees0HE5SSWTL0MdRCvxIz2pyww 8Wlf1zBD2NIS52dtYIQ5evH3x1Bxfoljt3dA9QpITD1zEKpGXWLOoxVQcT6JNQvfssDU7zq1 nBlm1/0tc6FqJCS2tjwB+51ZQFFiSvdDdgjbQOLIojms6H7hFfCSeDLxBfsERtlZSFKzkLTP QtKOrGYBI8sqRtHUguSC4qT0CiO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjOBE9GzRDsZ/560PMQpwMCrx8HbM mhomxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYS3ZCVQiDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4EKMpMNYmMkuJJucDk2ReSbyh sYm5qbGphYGhubmZkjjv7X1+YUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTB9TBycUg2M9YuXzPWVu3mkmu3IgfV7 NxlsKq/znf8/5c3Z8JRJWkY8t2tai3eyhByYV2UkyV3Hx9q3KnPf2U7NXbdTy88L98aKMcqr uRyepu5rbzkpU4Bx6WKrgFe2IunnfJx22i2vSF24ZOH2U67O9Uz3VnPUvPROe/H7n1r4/cBb ZitXv0udkrPOX89ZiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA3LYpLFoDAAA= DLP-Filter: Pass X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id u0D3qJW3013515 >> Instead of using watermark we should subtract SHMEM from pagecache for >> accounting in available memory >> >> Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang >> Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar >> Reviewed-by: Ajeet Yadav >What's missing from your commit description is: why? Nothing is missing from the commit description, I think this is enough to explain about the patch. Commit Description : Instead of using watermark we should subtract SHMEM from pagecache for accounting in available memory.