From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FA224B26; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733340106; cv=none; b=CMN/245n3RJWrKmQG9TftDcDU2jOUR8OEnUDEtuSNAeYfNYNd40045dmOdCPWw7inKYGBVXMin32fAtKeLc2MM4cxcZiHTVgWHKU7bPddiJavcOKOo0XG8uNd3JN9n7N/e4RmaRA8nbzoo9fK051DO8NvUAqiMazcOf4WDJTALs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733340106; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XvwEqCgaLZUkQxD62yH5xGJhJYQI48sqzkTzpiBTSzU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=STTVyqbqgrEcV9oYtng/NuNXQfejGFjD4C0A+bj9YFu4KBDPvovPpKQuJElRs64zzkYTMixP6Mfv7d+MmoC43pkFmJx8OuqRtzx0BTeu/0rIi94xsHDTu+twLZ0LPw1Tj0jOr/hvKCtJX6Dh/JiDOR3N34byHpffIHX8rzY9QIc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=ajNLWKeG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="ajNLWKeG" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279870.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4B4GXaCD023317; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:21:30 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= 4U2a+iogl9VHRsnyNgkVeDFo4vdPT+GZFNYfMDV4B8Q=; b=ajNLWKeG8XnRXwzR sE/RYcmfZN88Yo0v/2Tsa/B6Yli6kX0pz2ugKKgtTR8XLRZaBiQKW5tnCFzyDUjG hah7gkMHf3/ny2P0+5hTfTmzFSpelJGn2vvpNcM6xky+llTrOhmkuUxx6icNuhE3 Dw15nTS7TExFUFgBMKzUhjR/LrcY79Wwo+WC3JpR4KuQkVvO8Et1HvJks5EXKxWu xBPp+vfIhHJrYCL55dzy/iwpbQacAfrcmQ63ZEFzrhjvG8RPCh3LOeqI5rBLdQSg DME20U/hFTlJzfEYu/uYx7VNF2C/U8/pFwKL1gqXx6quBWwfBUXN8tfHdteIFtqA 0uANpQ== Received: from nalasppmta02.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 43aj429ymc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 04 Dec 2024 19:21:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.196]) by NALASPPMTA02.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 4B4JLS6K018655 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:21:28 GMT Received: from [10.71.110.107] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Wed, 4 Dec 2024 11:21:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20a3955e-3d10-47c5-8e68-d70342805010@quicinc.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 11:21:26 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: add kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo to apq8016 flakes To: Helen Mae Koike Fornazier CC: Rob Clark , Dmitry Baryshkov , Sean Paul , Marijn Suijten , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , linux-kernel , linux-arm-msm , dri-devel , freedreno References: <20241204-cursor_tor_skip-v1-1-f5f0bba5df7b@quicinc.com> <193931869a5.f923adf2270026.8321075661083367617@collabora.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Abhinav Kumar In-Reply-To: <193931869a5.f923adf2270026.8321075661083367617@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-GUID: -yi9Rln1Vs3X-sbEcRIRKWHjdiusp5_y X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: -yi9Rln1Vs3X-sbEcRIRKWHjdiusp5_y X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2411120000 definitions=main-2412040148 Hi Helen On 12/4/2024 11:14 AM, Helen Mae Koike Fornazier wrote: > Hi Abhinav, > > Thanks for your patch. > > > > ---- On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:55:17 -0300 Abhinav Kumar wrote --- > > > From the jobs [1] and [2] of pipeline [3], its clear that > > kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo is most certainly a flake and > > not a fail for apq8016. Mark the test accordingly to match the results. > > > > [1] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67676481 > > [2] : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/jobs/67677430 > > [3]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/pipelines/1322770 > > > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..18639853f18f > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails/msm-apq8016-flakes.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > > +# Board Name: msm-apq8016-db410c > > +# Failure Rate: 100 > > Is failure rate is 100%, isn't it a fail than? > (I know we have other cases with Failure Rate: 100, maybe we should fix them as well) > Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of "Failure rate" for a flake. I interpreted this as this test being flaky 100% of the time :) Out of the 3 runs of the test, it passed 2/3 times and failed 1/3. So its fail % actually is 33.33% in that case. I think I saw a Failure rate of 100% on msm-sm8350-hdk-flakes.txt and mistook that as the rate at which flakes are seen. Let me fix this up as 33% > Regards, > Helen > > > +# IGT Version: 1.28-ga73311079 > > +# Linux Version: 6.12.0-rc2 > > +kms_cursor_legacy@torture-bo > > > > --- > > base-commit: 798bb342e0416d846cf67f4725a3428f39bfb96b > > change-id: 20241204-cursor_tor_skip-9d128dd62c4f > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Abhinav Kumar quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> > > > > >