From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758140AbdJMOFz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:05:55 -0400 Received: from osg.samsung.com ([64.30.133.232]:41150 "EHLO osg.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753394AbdJMOFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:05:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review To: John Stultz , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: lkml , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable , Shuah Khan References: <20171012212538.671181286@linuxfoundation.org> From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <20b34af7-7deb-051a-e10c-56517b8bb4ef@osg.samsung.com> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:05:40 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/2017 06:09 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 10/12/2017 03:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.7 release. >>> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sat Oct 14 21:25:27 UTC 2017. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.13.7-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.13.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >> >> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. >> kselftest run regression since 4.13.6 >> >> selftests: posix_timers >> >> selftests: raw_skew >> ======================================== >> not ok 1..7 selftests: raw_skew [FAIL] > > Hrm... Did raw_skew provide any other output? > > Also, did you turn ntpd off before running? > > -john > John/Greg, Here is the detailed report fromn this test. I didn't disable ntpd. WARNING: ADJ_OFFSET in progress, this will cause inaccurate results Estimating clock drift: -16.319(est) -8.913(act) [FAILED] Bail out! Pass 0 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0 1..0 I can keep on eye on this. Not a show stopper for releasing the rc. thanks, -- Shuah