From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Surabhi Gogte (she/her)" <sgogte@purestorage.com>,
Martin Belanger <martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mkhalfella@purestorage.com, randyj@purestorage.com,
adailey@purestorage.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>,
wagi@kernel.org, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] nvme-tcp: parallelize I/O queue allocation and startup
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 08:15:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20efc96b-c57d-4bbf-8d3d-602b8c9e5828@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMof9cU5s0ck20fcSAYSvK-xpcP5_Hv2BmN20Bh3btpLum7THg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/30/26 10:25 PM, Surabhi Gogte (she/her) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 3:57 AM Martin Belanger
> <martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/22/26 16:07, Surabhi Gogte wrote:
>> > Similar to commit 2a8513091d2f ("nvme-rdma: parallelize I/O queue
>> > allocation and startup"), refactor nvme tcp I/O queue setup to use async
>> > API, combining allocation and startup into a single parallel operation
>> > per queue. This reduces connection and reconnection setup time when
>> > there are delays in establishing connections, which is especially
>> > important for high-core-count hosts.
>> [...]
>>
>> Hi Surabhi,
>>
>> This patch breaks NVMe/TCP connects with TLS. This is a different bug
>> from the pf_cache_lock one that Shin'ichiro reported.
>>
>> Test: one VM with 4 CPUs, nvmet-tcp on 127.0.0.1 with tsas tls1.3, a
>> connect with --tls and 4 I/O queues, and tlshd at upstream commit
>> a0bd51d.
>>
>> - Linus master 6b4b543fa187: 14 of 20 connects fail.
>> - Same tree with this patch reverted: 20 of 20 connects pass.
>> - Same tree with Daniel's pf_cache_lock fix [1]: 22 of 40 and 17 of 40
>> connects fail.
>>
>> On each failed connect, one I/O queue logs:
>>
>> nvme nvme0: queue 4: TLS handshake complete, error -110
>>
>> The tlshd that runs for the target logs:
>>
>> failed to search 'psk' key 'NVMe0R01 <hostnqn> <subnqn>'
>> gnutls: Error in password/key file. (-31)
>>
>> and closes the connection. The tlshd that runs for the host then gets
>> GNUTLS_E_PREMATURE_TERMINATION, which it reports to the kernel as
>> ETIMEDOUT. The other queues use the same PSK, and their handshakes
>> succeed. blktests nvme/062 and nvme/063 fail the same way.
>>
>> I can share the reproducer script.
>
> Hey Martin, can you try the tests once with tlshd using commit 3a6658e
> ("tlshd: Link the NFS keyrings per handshake instead of at startup")
> or ktls-utils 1.5. blktests nvme/062 and nvme/063 passed with this
> commit. I believe that change fixed the keyring race in tlshd
> independently. If the issue persists, let me know the reproducer
> script so I can also take a look. I saw the same errors while running
> blktests with an older tlshd version from ktls-utils 1.3.1 and
> updating tlshd worked.
>
Ouch. That will be tricky for distros. If there is a specific commit
which requires an update to ktlshd we need to have a way to identify
that; otherwise we'll see lots of regressions where customers have
updated only one side.
Please modify the patch to work with older versions of ktlshd.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 20:07 [PATCH v4 0/3] nvme-tcp: parallelize I/O setup queue in connect Surabhi Gogte
2026-09-22 20:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] nvme-tcp: store and use the caller's network namespace Surabhi Gogte
2026-09-22 20:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] nvme-tcp: refactor I/O queue setup path Surabhi Gogte
2026-09-22 20:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] nvme-tcp: parallelize I/O queue allocation and startup Surabhi Gogte
2026-10-18 12:25 ` Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2026-10-20 20:48 ` Surabhi Gogte (she/her)
2026-10-26 10:57 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-30 21:25 ` Surabhi Gogte (she/her)
2026-11-02 7:15 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-11-02 11:16 ` Martin Belanger
2026-10-13 15:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] nvme-tcp: parallelize I/O setup queue in connect Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20efc96b-c57d-4bbf-8d3d-602b8c9e5828@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=adailey@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.nvme.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=mkhalfella@purestorage.com \
--cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sgogte@purestorage.com \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®