From: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sortiz@dbear.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>,
"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrea Arcange" <andrea@suse.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Robert Love" <rml@tech9.net>, "Oleg Drokin" <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: 23 second kernel compile (aka which patches help scalibility on NUMA)
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:13:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <210438344.1015751637@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203100120290.26154-100000@dbear.engr.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203100120290.26154-100000@dbear.engr.sgi.com>
> Martin, I wrote a patch in order to have a kswap daemon per node. Each
> daemon swaps pages out only from its node. It might be of some interest
> for your scalability problem, so let me know if you're interested in it (I
> can't paste it here because it has also some other stuffs in it, and I
How does this interact with the virtual scanning stuff? I
was under the impression that we scanned for suitable pages
on a per-process basis ... so I'm confused as to how you'd
have a per-node kswapd without rmap's physical scanning
(unless you assume all processes on a node have all their
mem on that node). Could you explain?
> have to split the patch in several parts. I also need to port it to -rmap).
I'd certainly be interested to see / try it - I think Bill Irwin
had an implementation of multiple kswapd's for rmap - you might
want to look at that before you port.
Thanks,
M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-10 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-09 19:44 Dieter Nützel
2002-03-09 20:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-09 21:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-10 9:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
2002-03-10 17:13 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-09 5:47 Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-09 16:43 ` Erik Andersen
2002-03-09 17:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-03-09 18:37 ` Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
2002-03-11 18:23 ` Timothy D. Witham
2002-03-11 2:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-11 2:23 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-11 4:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-03-11 10:45 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='210438344.1015751637@[10.10.2.3]' \
--to=martin.bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=sortiz@dbear.engr.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®