From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 5.6-rc3: WARNING: CPU: 48 PID: 17435 at kernel/sched/fair.c:380 enqueue_task_fair+0x328/0x440
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:42:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2108173c-beaa-6b84-1bc3-8f575fb95954@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtD9b6o=B6jkbWNjfAw9e1UjT9Z07vxdsVfikEQdeCtfPw@mail.gmail.com>
On 04.03.20 16:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 08:55, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 08:37, Christian Borntraeger
>> <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
> [...]
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>>>> index 3c8a379c357e..beb773c23e7d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>>>>> @@ -4035,8 +4035,8 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>>>>>> __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
>>>>>> se->on_rq = 1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>>>>>> if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) {
>>>>>> - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>>>>>> check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Now running for 3 hours. I have not seen the issue yet. I can tell tomorrow if this fixes
>>>>> the issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still running fine. I can tell for sure tomorrow, but I have the impression that this makes the
>>>> WARN_ON go away.
>>>
>>> So I guess this change "fixed" the issue. If you want me to test additional patches, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks for the test. For now, I don't have any other patch to test. I
>> have to look more deeply how the situation happens.
>> I will let you know if I have other patch to test
>
> So I haven't been able to figure out how we reach this situation yet.
> In the meantime I'm going to make a clean patch with the fix above.
>
> Is it ok if I add a reported -by and a tested-by you ?
Sure-
I just realized that this system has something special. Some month ago I created 2 slices
$ head /etc/systemd/system/*.slice
==> /etc/systemd/system/machine-production.slice <==
[Unit]
Description=VM production
Before=slices.target
Wants=machine.slice
[Slice]
CPUQuota=2000%
CPUWeight=1000
==> /etc/systemd/system/machine-test.slice <==
[Unit]
Description=VM production
Before=slices.target
Wants=machine.slice
[Slice]
CPUQuota=300%
CPUWeight=100
And the guests are then put into these slices. that also means that this test will never use more than the 2300%.
No matter how much CPUs the system has.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 7:54 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-28 12:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-28 13:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-28 13:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-28 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-28 15:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-28 15:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-28 16:32 ` Qais Yousef
2020-02-28 16:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-02 11:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-02 18:17 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-03 7:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-03 7:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-04 15:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-04 17:42 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2020-03-04 17:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-04 19:19 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-03-04 19:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-04 19:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 9:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-05 11:28 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 12:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-03-05 12:33 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-05 12:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 13:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-05 13:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-05 12:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-03-05 11:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2108173c-beaa-6b84-1bc3-8f575fb95954@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®