From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>, git <git@xilinx.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: zynq: Add address-cells property to interrupt controllers
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:00:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <210b0e5a-767b-c285-62e2-23de19bd3cf1@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJnu1M6ut8g_36ve-OG22jFsySHbmVHOgtDRhc-s37rpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/1/21 6:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 8:27 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>
>> The commit 3eb619b2f7d8 ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version
>> v1.6.0-11-g9d7888cbf19c") updated dtc version which also contained DTC
>> commit
>> "81e0919a3e21 checks: Add interrupt provider test"
>> where reasons for this checking are mentioned as
>> "A missing #address-cells property is less critical, but creates
>> ambiguities when used in interrupt-map properties, so warn about this as
>> well now."
>>
>> Add address-cells property to gic and gpio nodes to get rid of this warning.
>> The similar change has been done for ZynqMP too.
>
> FYI, we're going to make this check dependent on having an
> interrupt-map property. So adding these isn't necessary.
Good to know. Is there going to be report if interrupt-map doesn't
exist? Which can end up with reverting these changes?
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 14:27 Michal Simek
2021-02-01 17:41 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-03 7:00 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2021-02-03 14:12 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-03 14:15 ` Michal Simek
2021-02-03 14:43 ` Andre Przywara
2021-02-03 16:49 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-03 18:03 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-04 20:09 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=210b0e5a-767b-c285-62e2-23de19bd3cf1@xilinx.com \
--to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=git@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®