From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
libseccomp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ARM audit, seccomp, etc are broken wrt OABI syscalls
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:52:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21114.4427.769890.875410@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131106004058.GU16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> OABI compat was meant to allow a transition from OABI to EABI. While
> a lot of effort went in to the kernel side of that, which does allow
> OABI based userspace to boot with an EABI kernel, and allows OABI built
> test programs to run under an EABI kernel, actually being able to
> migrate userland is far from trivial - and something that I've never
> been able to do. Hence, virtually all my long-running ARM machines
> here are stuck with OABI, and I don't see that situation ever changing.
I did a live incremental upgrade from OABI to EABI on my systems years
ago. What I did was to first patch my OABI glibc to look for .so files
in oabi/ subdirectories. Then I moved all OABI .so files to oabi/
subdirectories, and deleted all OABI static .a libraries. After that
it was "simply" a matter of rebuilding everything as EABI, in the right
order. The main advantage over this compared to a bootstrap-from-scratch
(which I've done 4 times on different architectures) was that I had access
to fully functional utilities and build tools from the start.
I _might_ be able to locate the glibc patch I used; do you want it?
/Mikael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 22:36 Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-06 0:14 ` Kees Cook
2013-11-06 0:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-06 3:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-07 12:55 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-11-07 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2013-11-07 19:04 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-11-06 9:52 ` Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2013-11-06 22:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-11-06 22:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-06 15:32 ` [libseccomp-discuss] " Eric Paris
2013-11-06 15:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-06 21:20 ` Will Drewry
2013-11-06 21:26 ` Kees Cook
2013-11-06 21:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-06 22:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21114.4427.769890.875410@gargle.gargle.HOWL \
--to=mikpelinux@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=libseccomp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®