From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755219Ab3AKMWH (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:22:07 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:37725 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754019Ab3AKMWF (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:22:05 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Yinghai Lu , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Tony Luck , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jiang Liu , Myron Stowe Subject: Re: [Alternative][PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance, v2 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:27:51 +0100 Message-ID: <2117635.fU9qB3jgKg@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc3+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3595317.Eh4AyqPa3o@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1558789.gX8cmBgyDV@vostro.rjw.lan> <3595317.Eh4AyqPa3o@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, January 11, 2013 12:40:30 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, January 10, 2013 02:54:00 PM Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > arch/ia64/pci/pci.c | 8 ++++++++ > > > arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 3 +++ > > > arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 9 +++++++++ > > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 18 ------------------ > > > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 19 ------------------- > > > drivers/pci/probe.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 - > > > include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ > > > 8 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions > > ... > > > I'll wait for comments from the others, if any, and put it into my acpi-scan > > > branch after a couple of days. It doesn't need to be there technically, but > > > it's kind of related. > > > > looks like you put it into acpi-scan-next instead. > > > > and it does touch pci code. > > > > can you put it in to acpi-scan ? so Bjorn could pull it again to pci/next. > > I will tomorrow. There is a problem with this, because the acpi-scan branch is based on v3.8-rc2 that doesn't the contain __devinit removal in arch/ia64/pci/pci.c which conflicts with the version of the $subject patch I have in linux-next. If I put this patch into acpi-scan and Bjorn pulls from it, he will need to resolve that conflict going forward and I will have to resolve it too, so we'll end up with two merge commits resolving the same conflict. For this reason, I think it would be better if Bjorn took the $subject patch directly to his tree, so I've dropped it from my linux-next branch. Bjorn, can you please apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1956491/ directly? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.