From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: proc: export a processes resource limits via proc/<pid>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:20:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21194.1187382045@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:45:47 PDT." <20070817124547.5415a839.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:45:47 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:59:18 -0400
> Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently, there exists no method for a process to query the resource
> > limits of another process. They can be inferred via some mechanisms but they
> > cannot be explicitly determined. Given that this information can be usefull to
> > know during the debugging of an application, I've written this patch which
> > exports all of a processes limits via /proc/<pid>/limits.
>
> I'm struggling with this a bit. Sure, it _might_ be handy on some
> occasions to be able to get at this information. But I've never seen
> anyone ask for it before, and it _is_ determinable by other means, if only
> strace.
Most of the times *I*'ve struggled with this, it's been a case of "this program
forks that one that calls a PAM module that does this and then double-forks
yadda yadda". So I know where Neil is coming from.
> How do we justify adding yet more stuff to the kernel?
I looked the code over, and *if* we want to do it, the code looks good.
Making that final call is why they pay you and Linus the big bucks. :)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 14:00 Neil Horman
2007-08-13 15:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-13 16:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-13 17:26 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-13 19:25 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-08-13 20:11 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-13 21:04 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-08-13 23:58 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-16 12:35 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-17 8:09 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-17 10:59 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-17 19:45 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-17 20:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2007-08-17 21:00 ` Neil Horman
2007-08-21 18:56 ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-23 2:40 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 10:53 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21194.1187382045@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®