mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: enable common clk and add support for Lynxpoint clocks
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:17:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2132297.E3RA4GlFZ9@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358516761-20981-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Friday, January 18, 2013 03:45:58 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> This is second iteration of the series. First revision is available here:
> 
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/14/213
> 
> Idea is to let the LPSS peripheral drivers to use common clk framework to
> get clock rate or enable/disable the functional clock. The discussion
> started in this thread:
> 
> 	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1417691
> 
> In summary, there is no point in adding a special case code to the drivers
> in order to pass them a fixed clock rate, but instead x86 should just
> enable common clk subsystem and take advantage of it.
> 
> We try to address that in this series. Instead of enabling the common clk
> framework by default we place it under CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS config option.
> This option then selects what is necessary to support the LPSS peripheral
> drivers.
> 
> We then create the Lynxpoint clock tree and populate it accordingly.
> 
> Changes to previous version:
> 	- add config option CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS
> 	- pass flags to acpi_create_platform_device() instead of calling
> 	  function in drivers/acpi/scan.c
> 	- create the clock platform devices in drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Mika Westerberg (3):
>   x86: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem
>   clk: x86: add support for Lynxpoint LPSS clocks
>   ACPI / platform: create LPSS clocks if Lynxpoint devices are found
>     during scan
> 
>  arch/x86/Kconfig             |   10 +++++
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c |   25 ++++++++++-
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h      |    6 ++-
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c          |   22 +++++-----
>  drivers/clk/Makefile         |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/x86/Makefile     |    2 +
>  drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpss.c   |   99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpss.h   |   36 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpt.c    |   86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 275 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpss.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpss.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/x86/clk-lpt.c

This version looks OK to me, so if there are no objections, I'm going to
apply it.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-19  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-18 13:45 Mika Westerberg
2013-01-18 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86: add support for Intel Low Power Subsystem Mika Westerberg
2013-01-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: x86: add support for Lynxpoint LPSS clocks Mika Westerberg
2013-01-22 18:47   ` Mike Turquette
2013-01-23 17:40     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-01-18 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI / platform: create LPSS clocks if Lynxpoint devices are found during scan Mika Westerberg
2013-01-19  0:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2132297.E3RA4GlFZ9@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome