From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932866AbdK2OEj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:04:39 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:50614 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752559AbdK2OEh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:04:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [3/3] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Combine two function calls in mcp23s08_dbg_show() To: Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sebastian Reichel , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <0510a811-e653-6310-5c7f-8d6434efca2a@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <2132d281-c4da-81b0-6dc7-4b42807cebf0@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:04:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cf+5V7RKdILMxwzhqDREGSUQivR/YlytfE6QVmygPQkqjb7YJYH sfpB+oCYr+IT+2RNZlrx7/sdkbI8f477RIcEQkXk2Vsl0NgDXQtraP3RFT8CtmS4IzdV+oF uexc92waQkvlueQHnzoWBeLHDZ9ZIci6T4iiuAHdEAibhmWlEus7zMgt5KfshnSHNcHuqmX RCRIH0f4sSGCSvNLnzQcg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:1TRUIGECU5A=:J8wlPqd5zq0b62msDRAy4m XC6yPUV7PCxv2dZusIPZL4o7aowd9obooIa1qUWkcOItnYXP3TMyXbG5zgeDrGf+CF/17aoXh c//FYNrTMxo5g+3LZoZx4wDpZBpY52on/6AredKgqHBHEl/2ShHiF6LFDlAjG0RWjABckBaUs nrKm2M25Zdd0ckBs1fMCTkKb/B0Alvp2bP+rNIjwj4uIHyT522lYkc+QW/BKcDnq7bRFGXc46 pLFv3CnAklJQoaLF2kKUua8MSTWh6Bjwg7f36uHO/+HJYmiNVUl5WPn1NvJVzgj7YRpBYvtxs nOuqmeSyQ3GffoUUSOA2QuGNe0zYtlPv2dDTCo+BFkQf/dH4xLFL2fxUdVkGLnPaEunQ/mpzQ +msXibo+hj81GmiG7zO2UhIpos4h7T2aN6yxd2T7uGiW+3v6dgOSo1rZnhnTiWhDdPdq5Fgm7 zWrYpWH7aPP8WReovvYKV2Fm2kCpCEzt6MevobfhVuMpntRmWpbUtLKRHSWfnsCEgGl81s84Y WU9gkYZPBYCabi/HBbMVYDsRUNqTwjqdkQapZw8YfR7C+aJdhRk88siZ91PD6Xee+8KNscRix M/phr7Ow0lyf+SAcOLi4H679/GXLTh8xoN7iscjPUiJILIYoQTMu1Sfq7QB2eGRzCWp9Y57pf +FQFTGBZHzdgymxi58iQnK0uwMbXbQssiYeyjSQiy+H3i6tAG2rFElkOVxhgdI2wjrPF7LyRS ySzPlu7Ym9Kw4ryhUfqsaOyxGFDCuJ+9v+cLSK+hKqFnVdxSEXH8QlV9Bvo83z4cqyqlH6TE6 z9XUykH/XLp4Csi9vkzxfkYDrOlVTw7K3BCf+bVp8grJhpyv0A= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> * Print a line break together with other data in a single function call. >> >> * Adjust indentation. … > > This does not apply. > Possibly depends on 2/3. Partly, yes. How do you think about the following possibilities? * Omit two context lines at the end from this update step. or * Refer to the jump label “done” (instead of renaming it to “unlock” before). Would you try once more to integrate the shown small change? Regards, Markus