From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: K2G: Add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:02:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2133897.t9KqoeriS0@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488882154-21485-1-git-send-email-d-gerlach@ti.com>
On Tuesday, March 07, 2017 04:22:29 AM Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Hi,
> This is v4 of the series to add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains.
> Previous versions can be found here:
>
> v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2413975.html
> v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2364612.html
> v1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525204.html
>
> After much debate I have returned to using the phandle cell to pass the SCI ID
> rather than the separate "ti,sci-id" property that was not very popular. In
> order to do this I needed to make a change to the genpd framework which can be
> seen in patch 2 and should benefit others that have client . Rather than
> checking for zero phandle args and failing if any are present the
> of_genpd_add_provider_simple call does not check at all and instead leaves
> parsing and interpretation up to the platform genpd driver.
>
> This allows the ti_sci_pm_domains driver to parse the phandle and use the first
> phandle cell as the sci-id rather than getting it from a separate property.
>
> Besides that none of the original patches have changed apart from updating the
> year to 2017 in patches 3 and 4 and of course a small update to patch 4 to let
> the ti_sci_pm_domains parse the phandle and extract the sci-id rather than
> looking for the rejected ti,sci-id property.
>
> I did not update the "power-domain" binding document because in regards to
> #power-domain-cells it already states "can be any value as specified by device
> tree binding documentation of particular provider" which I think already
> describes the change in patch 2.
I'm assuming that this will go in through the arm-soc tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-12 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-07 10:22 Dave Gerlach
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PM / Domains: Add generic data pointer to genpd data struct Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / Domains: Do not check if simple providers have phandle cells Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-13 8:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains Dave Gerlach
2017-03-12 17:21 ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-13 8:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-15 17:53 ` Rob Herring
2017-03-15 20:14 ` Dave Gerlach
2017-03-16 18:27 ` [PATCH v5 " Dave Gerlach
2017-03-18 20:38 ` Rob Herring
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-12 17:20 ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-13 8:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: keystone: Drop PM domain support for k2g Dave Gerlach
2017-03-12 17:20 ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-12 17:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-03-16 18:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: K2G: Add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains Dave Gerlach
2017-04-03 16:58 ` santosh.shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2133897.t9KqoeriS0@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®