mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: K2G: Add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:02:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2133897.t9KqoeriS0@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488882154-21485-1-git-send-email-d-gerlach@ti.com>

On Tuesday, March 07, 2017 04:22:29 AM Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Hi,
> This is v4 of the series to add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains.
> Previous versions can be found here:
> 
> v3: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2413975.html
> v2: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2364612.html
> v1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525204.html
> 
> After much debate I have returned to using the phandle cell to pass the SCI ID
> rather than the separate "ti,sci-id" property that was not very popular. In
> order to do this I needed to make a change to the genpd framework which can be
> seen in patch 2 and should benefit others that have client . Rather than
> checking for zero phandle args and failing if any are present the
> of_genpd_add_provider_simple call does not check at all and instead leaves
> parsing and interpretation up to the platform genpd driver.
> 
> This allows the ti_sci_pm_domains driver to parse the phandle and use the first
> phandle cell as the sci-id rather than getting it from a separate property.
> 
> Besides that none of the original patches have changed apart from updating the
> year to 2017 in patches 3 and 4 and of course a small update to patch 4 to let
> the ti_sci_pm_domains parse the phandle and extract the sci-id rather than
> looking for the rejected ti,sci-id property.
> 
> I did not update the "power-domain" binding document because in regards to
> #power-domain-cells it already states "can be any value as specified by device
> tree binding documentation of particular provider" which I think already
> describes the change in patch 2.

I'm assuming that this will go in through the arm-soc tree.

Thanks,
Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-12 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-07 10:22 Dave Gerlach
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PM / Domains: Add generic data pointer to genpd data struct Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:19   ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PM / Domains: Do not check if simple providers have phandle cells Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:18   ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-13  8:20   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains Dave Gerlach
2017-03-12 17:21   ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-13  8:21   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-15 17:53   ` Rob Herring
2017-03-15 20:14     ` Dave Gerlach
2017-03-16 18:27   ` [PATCH v5 " Dave Gerlach
2017-03-18 20:38     ` Rob Herring
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver Dave Gerlach
2017-03-10 21:22   ` Kevin Hilman
2017-03-12 17:20   ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-13  8:21   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-07 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: keystone: Drop PM domain support for k2g Dave Gerlach
2017-03-12 17:20   ` santosh.shilimkar
2017-03-12 17:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-03-16 18:31   ` [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: K2G: Add support for TI-SCI Generic PM Domains Dave Gerlach
2017-04-03 16:58     ` santosh.shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2133897.t9KqoeriS0@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®