From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: "Mario Limonciello (AMD)" <superm1@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki ⏎" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPI: CPPC: Refactor boost ratio handling
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:40:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <213bc2ba-2ee4-4a89-9054-3bd953546789@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924160052.2858456-2-superm1@kernel.org>
On 9/24/26 17:00, Mario Limonciello (AMD) wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>
> Rename amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator() to amd_get_effective_highest_perf()
> to better reflect that it returns the effective highest performance value
> for a CPU, accounting for preferred cores and heterogeneous topologies.
>
> Add a new helper amd_get_boost_ratio() for doing both for boost
> ratio calculations and update callers to use it.
>
> This refactoring is needed because on some AMD systems (Zen6+),
> the boost ratio should be calculated from frequency values rather than
> performance values.
I think I see why you chose to implement it this way (the x86 APERF / MPERF)
issue, but I'd still prefer it to be spelled out here why this is necessary.
>
> The frequency values will eventually come from the BIOS, but for now
> use some hardcoded values for Zen6 platforms.
>
> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 5 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 14 ++-
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 14 ++-
> 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> index d2185b7a20306..1c6bf56c3215b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/topology.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
>
> #define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE 196
> #define CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PREFCORE 166
> @@ -95,31 +96,18 @@ int cpc_write_ffh(int cpunum, struct cpc_reg *reg, u64 val)
>
> static void amd_set_max_freq_ratio(void)
> {
> - struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps;
> - u64 numerator, nominal_perf;
> + u64 numerator, denominator;
> u64 perf_ratio;
> int rc;
>
> - rc = cppc_get_perf_caps(0, &perf_caps);
> - if (rc) {
> - pr_debug("Could not retrieve perf counters (%d)\n", rc);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - rc = amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(0, &numerator);
> + rc = amd_get_boost_ratio(0, &numerator, &denominator);
> if (rc) {
> - pr_debug("Could not retrieve highest performance (%d)\n", rc);
> - return;
> - }
> - nominal_perf = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
> -
> - if (!nominal_perf) {
> - pr_debug("Could not retrieve nominal performance\n");
> + pr_debug("Could not retrieve boost ratio (%d)\n", rc);
> return;
> }
>
> /* midpoint between max_boost and max_P */
> - perf_ratio = (div_u64(numerator * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, nominal_perf) + SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 1;
> + perf_ratio = (div_u64(numerator * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE, denominator) + SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 1;
>
> freq_invariance_set_perf_ratio(perf_ratio, false);
> }
> @@ -239,35 +227,30 @@ int amd_detect_prefcore(bool *detected)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_detect_prefcore);
>
> /**
> - * amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator: Get the numerator to use for boost ratio calculation
> - * @cpu: CPU to get numerator for.
> - * @numerator: Output variable for numerator.
> - *
> - * Determine the numerator to use for calculating the boost ratio on
> - * a CPU. On systems that support preferred cores, this will be a hardcoded
> - * value. On other systems this will the highest performance register value.
> + * amd_get_effective_highest_perf: Get the effective highest performance value
> + * @cpu: CPU to get highest performance for.
> *
> - * If booting the system with amd-pstate enabled but preferred cores disabled then
> - * the correct boost numerator will be returned to match hardware capabilities
> - * even if the preferred cores scheduling hints are not enabled.
> + * Get the effective highest performance value for a CPU, accounting for
> + * preferred cores and heterogeneous topologies. On systems with preferred
> + * cores, this may be a hardcoded value. On heterogeneous systems, this
> + * may be a per-CPU value. On other systems, this is the shared highest
> + * performance value.
> *
> - * Return: 0 for success, negative error code otherwise.
> + * Return: Effective highest performance value, or negative error code.
> */
> -int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator)
> +int amd_get_effective_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> bool prefcore;
> int ret;
> u32 tmp;
>
> ret = amd_detect_prefcore(&prefcore);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> /* without preferred cores, return the highest perf register value */
> - if (!prefcore) {
> - *numerator = boost_numerator;
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (!prefcore)
> + return boost_numerator;
>
> /*
> * For AMD CPUs with Family ID 19H and Model ID range 0x70 to 0x7f,
> @@ -277,8 +260,7 @@ int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator)
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ZEN4)) {
> switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> case 0x70 ... 0x7f:
> - *numerator = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
> - return 0;
> + return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -286,28 +268,100 @@ int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator)
>
> /* detect if running on heterogeneous design */
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES)) {
> - switch (cpu_data(cpu).topo.cpu_type) {
> - case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_UNKNOWN:
> - case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_ANY:
> - pr_warn("Undefined core type found for cpu %d\n", cpu);
> - break;
> - case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_PERFORMANCE:
> - /* use the max scale for performance cores */
> - *numerator = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
> - return 0;
> - case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_LOW_POWER:
> - case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_EFFICIENCY:
> - /* use the highest perf value for efficiency and low-power cores */
> - ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &tmp);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - *numerator = tmp;
> - return 0;
> - }
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ZEN5) &&
> + cpu_data(cpu).topo.cpu_type == TOPO_CPU_TYPE_PERFORMANCE)
> + return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PERFORMANCE;
> +
> + /* Zen 5 efficiency, and Zen 6+ */
> + ret = amd_get_highest_perf(cpu, &tmp);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return tmp;
> + }
> +
> + return CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PREFCORE;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_effective_highest_perf);
> +
> +struct amd_max_freq {
> + u32 performance;
> + u32 efficiency;
> + u32 low_power;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct amd_max_freq max_freq_zen6_client = {
> + .performance = 5025,
> + .efficiency = 3524,
> + .low_power = 2399,
> +};
> +
> +int amd_get_max_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + enum x86_topology_cpu_type type = cpu_data(cpu).topo.cpu_type;
> + const struct amd_max_freq *max_freq = NULL;
> +
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ZEN6) &&
> + cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES))
> + max_freq = &max_freq_zen6_client;
> +
> + if (!max_freq)
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_PERFORMANCE:
> + return max_freq->performance;
> + case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_EFFICIENCY:
> + return max_freq->efficiency;
> + case TOPO_CPU_TYPE_LOW_POWER:
> + return max_freq->low_power;
> + default:
> + break;
> }
>
> - *numerator = CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_PREFCORE;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_max_frequency);
> +
> +/**
> + * amd_get_boost_ratio: Get numerator and denominator for boost ratio
> + * @cpu: CPU to get the boost ratio for.
> + * @numerator: Output variable for numerator.
> + * @denominator: Output variable for denominator.
> + *
> + * Get the numerator and denominator for calculating the boost ratio.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 for success, negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int amd_get_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator, u64 *denominator)
> +{
> + struct cppc_perf_caps perf_caps;
> + int max_frequency;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, &perf_caps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + max_frequency = amd_get_max_frequency(cpu);
> + /* Use frequency values if available */
> + if (max_frequency && perf_caps.nominal_freq) {
> + *numerator = max_frequency;
> + *denominator = perf_caps.nominal_freq;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Fall back to performance values */
> + ret = amd_get_effective_highest_perf(cpu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *numerator = ret;
> +
> + *denominator = perf_caps.nominal_perf;
> + if (!*denominator)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> return 0;
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_boost_ratio);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 10ea6035f4ad6..523ee1a06ef8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -640,12 +640,13 @@ static u64 get_max_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *nominal_freq)
> }
>
> if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
> - ret = amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(cpu, &highest_perf);
> - if (ret) {
> + ret = amd_get_effective_highest_perf(cpu);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> pr_debug("CPU%d: Unable to get boost ratio numerator (%d)\n",
> cpu, ret);
> return 0;
> }
> + highest_perf = ret;
> } else {
> highest_perf = perf_caps.highest_perf;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index fbccbe86c94d0..496e0342c1c90 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -555,11 +555,13 @@ static int msr_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(cpudata->cpu, &numerator);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = amd_get_effective_highest_perf(cpudata->cpu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = rdmsrq_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_AMD_CPPC_REQ, &cppc_req);
> + numerator = ret;
> +
> + ret = rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_AMD_CPPC_REQ, &cppc_req);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -590,10 +592,12 @@ static int shmem_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(cpudata->cpu, &numerator);
> - if (ret)
> + ret = amd_get_effective_highest_perf(cpudata->cpu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + numerator = ret;
> +
> perf.highest_perf = numerator;
> perf.max_limit_perf = numerator;
> perf.min_limit_perf = cppc_perf.lowest_perf;
> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> index 3f0005abac648..5bcdb0e553b96 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
> @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ extern int cppc_set_auto_sel(int cpu, bool enable);
> extern int cppc_get_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 *perf_limited);
> extern int cppc_set_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 bits_to_clear);
> extern int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf);
> -extern int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator);
> +extern int amd_get_effective_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu);
> +extern int amd_get_max_frequency(unsigned int cpu);
> +extern int amd_get_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator, u64 *denominator);
> extern int amd_detect_prefcore(bool *detected);
> #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB */
> static inline int cppc_get_desired_perf(int cpunum, u64 *desired_perf)
> @@ -321,7 +323,15 @@ static inline int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf)
> {
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> -static inline int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator)
> +static inline int amd_get_effective_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +static inline int amd_get_max_frequency(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int amd_get_boost_ratio(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator, u64 *denominator)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 16:00 [PATCH v3 0/3] Zen6 client CPPC Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-09-24 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPI: CPPC: Refactor boost ratio handling Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-09-25 9:40 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-09-24 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq: Use amd_get_boost_ratio() Mario Limonciello (AMD)
2026-09-24 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Get Highest Freq for a CPU Mario Limonciello (AMD)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=213bc2ba-2ee4-4a89-9054-3bd953546789@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®