From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755236Ab1I1VaU (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:30:20 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:35226 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752565Ab1I1VaS (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:30:18 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: Will Drewry Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines , Alasdair G Kergon , Milan Broz , dm-devel@redhat.com, Elly Jones , Olof Johansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm: verity target In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:02:05 CDT." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1316112359-6085-1-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1317245414_2944P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:30:14 -0400 Message-ID: <21505.1317245414@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020209.4E8391E8.000B,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1317245414_2944P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:02:05 CDT, Will Drewry said: > I was just curious if there is any interest in pulling this change, or > if not, if there is any particular set of concerns, fixes, etc. Out of curiosity, how much of the stack does this end up eating? My root= filesystem is already ext4 on an LVM partition that's on a LUKS/dm-crypt partition on a hard drive, and I'm sure somebody out there will have used= xfs instead - and then exported it via NFS or something. Are we going to get = weird stack overflows if people throw dm-verity into this sort of mix? > realize it's not a small amount of code to digest (though it is > smaller than the post from last year=5B1=5D). Would re-posting with a= n > added blob explaining the name be useful, Probably will need it to be merged, unless you set up an auto-reply that = says =22Patch rejected, 'verity' is *not* a typo for 'verify'=22 ;) I'll hopefully have some more comments over the weekend if I get some spa= re cycles. --==_Exmh_1317245414_2944P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOg5HmcC3lWbTT17ARAiyZAKCTnnZ0SrjxMx727zoBr0/u+rJdMQCg0Lte zpMBlja3FzmgAxZ8M+5CD6Q= =e2DA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1317245414_2944P--