From: Jiping Ma <Jiping.Ma2@windriver.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will.deacon@arm.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 10:17:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21530ce5-3847-c669-2a64-7c59ffb45f35@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808132455.5fa2c660@gandalf.local.home>
On 2019年08月09日 01:24, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 18:11:53 +0100
> Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>>> We could make it more descriptive of what it will do and not the reason
>>> for why it is done...
>>>
>>>
>>> ARCH_FTRACE_SHIFT_STACK_TRACER
>> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Thanks Will!
>
> Here's the official patch.
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Most archs (well at least x86) store the function call return address on the
> stack before storing the local variables for the function. The max stack
> tracer depends on this in its algorithm to display the stack size of each
> function it finds in the back trace.
>
> Some archs (arm64), may store the return address (from its link register)
> just before calling a nested function. There's no reason to save the link
> register on leaf functions, as it wont be updated. This breaks the algorithm
> of the max stack tracer.
>
> Add a new define ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS that an architecture may set
ARCH_FTRACE_SHIFT_STACK_TRACER is used in the code.
Jiping
> if it stores the return address (link register) after it stores the
> function's local variables, and have the stack trace shift the values of the
> mapped stack size to the appropriate functions.
>
> Link: 20190802094103.163576-1-jiping.ma2@windriver.com
>
> Reported-by: Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@windriver.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 5ab5200b2bdc..d48667b04c41 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,19 @@
> #define MCOUNT_ADDR ((unsigned long)_mcount)
> #define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE AARCH64_INSN_SIZE
>
> +/*
> + * Currently, gcc tends to save the link register after the local variables
> + * on the stack. This causes the max stack tracer to report the function
> + * frame sizes for the wrong functions. By defining
> + * ARCH_FTRACE_SHIFT_STACK_TRACER, it will tell the stack tracer to expect
> + * to find the return address on the stack after the local variables have
> + * been set up.
> + *
> + * Note, this may change in the future, and we will need to deal with that
> + * if it were to happen.
> + */
> +#define ARCH_FTRACE_SHIFT_STACK_TRACER 1
> +
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> #include <linux/compat.h>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> index 5d16f73898db..642a850af81a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,20 @@ static void check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
> i++;
> }
>
> +#ifdef ARCH_FTRACE_SHIFT_STACK_TRACER
> + /*
> + * Some archs will store the link register before calling
> + * nested functions. This means the saved return address
> + * comes after the local storage, and we need to shift
> + * for that.
> + */
> + if (x > 1) {
> + memmove(&stack_trace_index[0], &stack_trace_index[1],
> + sizeof(stack_trace_index[0]) * (x - 1));
> + x--;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> stack_trace_nr_entries = x;
>
> if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-07 17:28 [PATCH 0/2 v2] tracing/arm: Fix the stack tracer when LR is saved after local storage Steven Rostedt
2019-08-07 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data Steven Rostedt
2019-08-07 19:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-08 16:28 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-08 16:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-08 17:11 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-08 17:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-09 2:17 ` Jiping Ma [this message]
2019-08-09 2:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-13 17:31 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-13 17:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-09 8:55 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-07 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] tracing: Document the stack trace algorithm in the comments Steven Rostedt
2019-08-08 20:17 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21530ce5-3847-c669-2a64-7c59ffb45f35@windriver.com \
--to=jiping.ma2@windriver.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®