mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+554266c04a41d1f9754d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, ebiggers@google.com, edumazet@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tom@quantonium.net,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: general protection fault in requeue_rx_msgs
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 14:34:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <215d6d32-0131-a1dd-33c4-23866f399d0d@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000000482ce056d7c1436@google.com>

On 31.05.2018 11:16, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following crash on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    0044cdeb7313 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel...
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15aeff0f800000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=968b0b23c7854c0b
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=554266c04a41d1f9754d
> compiler:       gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
> syzkaller repro:https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=131a208f800000
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+554266c04a41d1f9754d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
> kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
> Dumping ftrace buffer:
>    (ftrace buffer empty)
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 4788 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7+ #74
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Workqueue: kstrp strp_work
> RIP: 0010:__skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:1844 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:__skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:1861 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:requeue_rx_msgs+0x14d/0x620 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:226
> RSP: 0018:ffff8801aa97f0b8 EFLAGS: 00010202
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffffffff86d54ed3
> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff86d531e2 RDI: 0000000000000008
> RBP: ffff8801aa97f1b8 R08: ffff8801aaa8e3c0 R09: ffffed0035f0a0e8
> R10: ffffed0035f0a0e8 R11: ffff8801af850743 R12: ffff8801d4407000
> R13: ffffed003552fe22 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8801a6bb06c0
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8801dae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007fba7c5099a0 CR3: 00000001af6f6000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
>  unreserve_rx_kcm+0x471/0x520 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:334
>  kcm_rcv_strparser+0x109/0x8d0 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:375
>  __strp_recv+0x34b/0x2130 net/strparser/strparser.c:328
>  strp_recv+0xcf/0x110 net/strparser/strparser.c:362
>  tcp_read_sock+0x2aa/0x810 net/ipv4/tcp.c:1652
>  strp_read_sock+0x1a1/0x2d0 net/strparser/strparser.c:385
>  do_strp_work net/strparser/strparser.c:440 [inline]
>  strp_work+0xcd/0x120 net/strparser/strparser.c:449
>  process_one_work+0xc1e/0x1b50 kernel/workqueue.c:2145
>  worker_thread+0x1cc/0x1440 kernel/workqueue.c:2279
>  kthread+0x345/0x410 kernel/kthread.c:240
>  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:412
> Code: 80 3c 1a 00 0f 85 70 04 00 00 48 8d 78 08 4d 8b 74 24 08 49 c7 04 24 00 00 00 00 49 c7 44 24 08 00 00 00 00 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 1a 00 0f 85 a7 04 00 00 4c 89 f2 4c 89 70 08 48 c1 ea 03
> RIP: __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:1844 [inline] RSP: ffff8801aa97f0b8
> RIP: __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:1861 [inline] RSP: ffff8801aa97f0b8
> RIP: requeue_rx_msgs+0x14d/0x620 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:226 RSP: ffff8801aa97f0b8
> ---[ end trace e4c0e45094907eaa ]---

This looks like the same as syzbot+5f1a04e374a635efc426@syzkaller.appspotmail.com:
"WARNING in kcm_exit_net (3)". This may confirm the theory. It looks like after async
pernet_operations the race window became bigger, and now the work has more chances
to have no a time to complete.

I'm not close to this code. Tom, could you please to say, whether kcm_done_work()
can be called for in-kernel kcm sockets (created via kcm_clone())?

Also, is there a possibility to create !kernel socket in kcm_clone()? I forgot
the reasons, why we can't do that in some places.

Thanks,
Kirill

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-31 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-31  8:16 syzbot
2018-05-31 11:34 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2019-04-13  9:39 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=215d6d32-0131-a1dd-33c4-23866f399d0d@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+554266c04a41d1f9754d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tom@quantonium.net \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®