From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (mailout.nod.at [116.203.167.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F893E8690 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773758327; cv=none; b=JecKzwpZ6CnLxdc5Pw+tNKXXwuSDXc96iAGojrJxcqjrJw+W8fuo8zKZA9aNFWAY2vuqKYIbcCHsWJ74FEeVhSgWgFgqWWxQySAbKrjHpwdiR0vYEmcZbPmKkhP6z1Q6IXZIHqKnL/sxtMnwchLwOVIwDWYqCP9ldi5bOVRILCE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773758327; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g3ziL1uOPG26N60cR7YBnbugzk1elFpAN+/26zXGkmI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XNFzjUY0b+YfAns5zF1+YwYu96K0VcrsLTTt3DBYQPXw+lF4FNKYPgl7XsihSpO4d/HrMJE0LqHEFdp8ymRIUyHoh8sFWY+FxSxvwzUVLzwYsR1jbHpg8Y1BEi7abzID0vWQkOoTkzO61qxhJkERmxQEYcJKGG/GRoSS2w7dxho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251452A8813; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id JVFc-2brI84U; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF22DBE33F; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bGQlM34sh7um; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770A52ABFDC; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:38:41 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Weinberger To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Kuan-Wei Chiu , Andrew Morton , chengzhihao1 , jserv , eleanor15x , marscheng , linux-mtd , linux-kernel Message-ID: <218787364.49542.1773758321128.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: References: <20260315193900.218737-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> <1295583760.42468.1773645957126.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/list_sort: introduce list_sort_nonatomic() and remove dummy cmp() calls Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF148 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: lib/list_sort: introduce list_sort_nonatomic() and remove dummy cmp() calls Thread-Index: uDEeBY8PTxKklIbTW3z36v/lSAdQYw== ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- >> For UBIFS, this patch doesn't alter the frequency, timing, or behavior >> of the cond_resched() calls at all, so I am confident that this won't >> introduce any regressions. >=20 > I'd be tempted to drop the workaround and remove the cond_resched > from ubifs given that entirely non-preemptible scheduling models are > on their way out. arm32 still has no preempt-lazy. This is one of the biggest platforms where UBIFS is still used. Thanks, //richard