From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com (lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6332EC0B9; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.235 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758109792; cv=none; b=ECNqg5Xhz4pf8ZEgA9mlDL6xEIHZPbqi6vba1PlrBn8TPgLIPie7nXgHd0sjR0XI+/SccVdLA3GhGSgV8K3Y+qMXv/ehfw6dJhkrQiVcyeEaEAMCqdsAJ9A8NC2yZOPDtj96IikaowXWIpHqB67vkctnmdadS7iU14WxnUjbzGk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758109792; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ee5UiMtEunJ0B5ZQtmbMrdcHQzYVMO4el/bZHCHvql4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=EjVqlzBJoe/AYzfEfJS27oxL9C4bqufp+frWjHAWWLgyvnj/uEqXxzUFHM/bemkKUeYnRGwMeMGF0eHApM/ChIef4PDg33omDWH5lLrt5gPmpDmo80QuLxp5EJjUUZ47jL8blOJAEMi2LsVR0cb09OixqOjI/raTICrVe1/6634= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=GYYj+jDD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.235 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="GYYj+jDD" Received: from fllvem-sh04.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.54]) by lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 58HBnZiE241612; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:49:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1758109775; bh=o5RI0cwCpMESoyhhUyJOMYzRr0pXrL8WMtTQZ2c7IaE=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=GYYj+jDDc5/As1obPU9MJvrA/pG/jdkCq1TT16Ft5meisQMuRNN+BFx2jLQh9jh+Q BFqdsAq4G1RWYoV6id/bRnySFxBv05ay8z5ixH62di4M9E/9KGDaNP5/n2BjvSTQcw +EFe4PMo2qmVs3i5TVC+TsnqKpjecKOfNi1ndJoQ= Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (dlee111.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.22]) by fllvem-sh04.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 58HBnYlD2314382 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:49:34 -0500 Received: from DLEE212.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:49:34 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.8) by DLEE212.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:49:34 -0500 Received: from [172.24.231.152] (danish-tpc.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.231.152]) by lelvem-mr06.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 58HBnTao2982599; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:49:30 -0500 Message-ID: <219398b5-8d09-46cd-b1f4-580a26ddab67@ti.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:19:28 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ti: am65-cpsw: Update hw timestamping filter for PTPv1 RX packets To: vishnu singh , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: References: <20250917041455.1815579-1-v-singh1@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: MD Danish Anwar In-Reply-To: <20250917041455.1815579-1-v-singh1@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea On 17/09/25 9:44 am, vishnu singh wrote: > From: Vishnu Singh > > CPTS module of CPSW supports hardware timestamping of PTPv1 packets.Update > the "hwtstamp_rx_filters" of CPSW driver to enable timestamping of received > PTPv1 packets. Also update the advertised capability to include PTPv1. > > Signed-off-by: Vishnu Singh Patch prefix should mention which tree you are targeting. Since this looks like new feature and not a bug fix. Prefix should have been "[PATCH net-next]". Please note that for future posting. The patch however looks okay to me. Reviewed-by: MD Danish Anwar -- Thanks and Regards, Danish