Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Reorganize KVM/x86 maintainership

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 6/23/22 14:05, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> +KVM PARAVIRT (KVM/paravirt)
>> +M:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> +R:	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>> +L:	kvm@vger.kernel.org
>> +S:	Supported
>> +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git
>> +F:	arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +F:	arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
>> +F:	arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>> +F:	include/linux/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	include/uapi/linux/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	include/uapi/asm-generic/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	include/asm-generic/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	arch/um/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> +F:	arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> 
> If we add Async PF to the 'KVM/paravirt' scope:
> 
> +F:   virt/kvm/async_pf.c
> and maybe even
> +F:   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> 
> then I can probably volunteer as a reviewer.

There is of course a host component to all paravirt infrastructure, the 
idea was to have a separate part specifically for the guest side.  It 
tends to have its own set of issues (e.g. suspend/resume, 32-bit, etc.). 
  I will add you anyway as reviewer, it makes sense.

>> +KVM X86 HYPER-V (KVM/hyper-v)
>> +M:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> +M:	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>> +M:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> Don't we also need:
> 
> S:   Supported
> L:   kvm@vger.kernel.org
> 
> here?

Yeah, especially the "S" (the list is caught by the generic KVM part).

Paolo

>> +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git
>> +F:	arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.*
>> +F:	arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.*
>> +F:	arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.*
> 
> +F:   arch/x86/kvm/svm/hyperv.*
> 
>> +F:	arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.*
>> +
>>   KERNFS
>>   M:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>   M:	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>