From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964882AbWLNWVr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:21:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964863AbWLNWVr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:21:47 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:39204 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964882AbWLNWVq (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:21:46 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A05fFi/7iI/4S+8lCJh2MesOV8zO2bSrR0coG7tD2O1B+vP8wH3ekbpsP+tgaiwiSY/s6djGCImO/Od05iqdiGjEbceQBU/n5HPO7y1ic4BgxX4jFLqyguW4758reyCkps1zaesduNPDBc4Sb/dMGA/4P2kwJ8arL4gQrGk/B54= Message-ID: <21d7e9970612141421o79a47705i8a87adbdcbf8b3a9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:21:45 +1100 From: "Dave Airlie" To: "Jeff Garzik" Subject: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] Cc: Alan , "Rik van Riel" , "Greg KH" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Andrew Morton" , "Martin Bligh" , "Michael K. Edwards" , "Linus Torvalds" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4581726B.9050006@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061214003246.GA12162@suse.de> <22299.1166057009@lwn.net> <20061214005532.GA12790@suse.de> <20061214051015.GA3506@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <20061214084820.GA29311@suse.de> <4581595C.7080508@redhat.com> <20061214154734.189a23c6@localhost.localdomain> <4581726B.9050006@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/15/06, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan wrote: > > Another thing we should do more is aggressively merge prototype open > > drivers for binary only hardware - lets get Nouveau's DRM bits into the > > kernel ASAP for example. > > ACK++ We should definitely push Nouveau[1] as hard as we can. > > Jeff > It'll get in when the developers feel it is at a stage where it can be supported, at the moment (I'm not speaking for all the nouveau team only my own opinion) the API isn't stable and putting it into the kernel only means we've declared the API supportable, I know in theory marking it EXPERIMENTAL might work, in practice it will just cause us headaches at this stage, there isn't enough knowledgeable developers working on it both support users and continue development at a decent rate, so mainly ppl are concentrating on development until it can at least play Q3, and for me dualhead on my G5 :-) Dave.